2017
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2017.050324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-national Study of Student Teachers' Views about Intelligence: Similarities and Differences in England and Turkey

Abstract: A cross-national descriptive research method was used to explore Turkish and English student teachers' views about intelligence, and the factors which shape them. The "Adult Version of The Implicit Theory of Intelligence Scale" [1], and the Turkish version of this scale [2] were used to investigate the views of 114 English and 201 Turkish students of Primary Education. A semi-structured interview was also used with a sub-group of the students. The findings reveal that the Turkish students, on average, scored m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes directly mirror the findings from Graham et al (2023) as the current study included all of the teachers from the prior investigation with three exceptions (one general and two special education teachers). They are also consistent with studies showing teachers typically believe that intelligence is malleable (e.g., Ilhan-Beyazatas & Dawson, 2017;Jones et al, 2012) and writing development and knowledge are not fixed or certain (Graham et al, 2021(Graham et al, , 2022(Graham et al, , 2023.…”
Section: Teachers' Mindsets Predict Reported Writing Practicessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These outcomes directly mirror the findings from Graham et al (2023) as the current study included all of the teachers from the prior investigation with three exceptions (one general and two special education teachers). They are also consistent with studies showing teachers typically believe that intelligence is malleable (e.g., Ilhan-Beyazatas & Dawson, 2017;Jones et al, 2012) and writing development and knowledge are not fixed or certain (Graham et al, 2021(Graham et al, , 2022(Graham et al, , 2023.…”
Section: Teachers' Mindsets Predict Reported Writing Practicessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Much less research has examined teachers’ mindsets and their relation to teaching or student achievement. While relatively few in number, studies with teachers have investigated a range of topics including the mindsets held by teachers (e.g., Graham et al, 2023; Ilhan-Beyazatas & Dawson, 2017; Jones et al, 2012), relationships between teacher and student mindsets and students’ academic performance (e.g., Bostwick et al, 2020; Mesler et al, 2021), and the effectiveness of training designed to promote a growth mindset among teachers (e.g., Patrick & Joshi, 2019; Rissanen et al, 2019; Seaton, 2018). In order to better understand the relationships that exist between teachers’ mindsets, their teaching practices, and ultimately students’ beliefs and academic progress, more research is needed in this area, including how teachers’ mindsets are related to their teaching practices (the focus of this investigation).…”
Section: Mindset Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As educational and cultural contexts differ widely, it is necessary to acknowledge that we still possess little knowledge of teachers' mindsets elsewhere in the world, for example in developing countries. The few studies that exist and were included in this review indeed indicate the presence of cultural differences (Asbury et al, 2015;Ilhan-Beyaztas and Dawson, 2017;Zhang et al, 2020).…”
Section: Limitation Of This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 97%