2021
DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia2030017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Mental Wellbeing, Coping and Quality of Working Life in Health and Social Care Workers in the UK at Two Time Points of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract: As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve around the world, it is important to examine its effect on societies and individuals, including health and social care (HSC) professionals. The aim of this study was to compare cross-sectional data collected from HSC staff in the UK at two time points during the COVID-19 pandemic: Phase 1 (May–July 2020) and Phase 2 (November 2020–January 2021). The HSC staff surveyed consisted of nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, social care workers and social workers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Engaging in the negative, more avoidant coping strategies was also found in our earlier study phases [32][33][34] and within the literature, with the usage of these strategies being found to have a negative relationship and impact on mental wellbeing and resulting in increased burnout within the HSC workforce [50,60,62,63,[65][66][67]. Amongst respondents in Phase 3 of this present study there was widespread recognition that pandemic-related work responsibilities had affected respondents' quality of home life, with working from home not enabling a break from work for many of this workforce and it was noted that an emphasis should be placed on re/creating a more healthy work-life balance [68].…”
Section: Main Messages In Comparison With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Engaging in the negative, more avoidant coping strategies was also found in our earlier study phases [32][33][34] and within the literature, with the usage of these strategies being found to have a negative relationship and impact on mental wellbeing and resulting in increased burnout within the HSC workforce [50,60,62,63,[65][66][67]. Amongst respondents in Phase 3 of this present study there was widespread recognition that pandemic-related work responsibilities had affected respondents' quality of home life, with working from home not enabling a break from work for many of this workforce and it was noted that an emphasis should be placed on re/creating a more healthy work-life balance [68].…”
Section: Main Messages In Comparison With the Literaturesupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results of Phase 3 of this study will be used to expand on recommendations from earlier phases that could be used to inform policies and procedures for HSC employers to help counteract the adverse long-term effects the pandemic on mental wellbeing and work-related quality of life. Other papers linked to the wider study have explored the findings of the earlier phases [32,33], social care and social workers [34] and the 'clapping for carers' initiative [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general population, several longitudinal studies suggest that initial high levels of anxiety, depression and other Covid-related psychopathology tend to remit with time (Hirten et al ., 2020; McFadden et al ., 2021; Miguel-Puga et al ., 2021; Sampaio et al ., 2021; Sasaki et al ., 2021; Van Steenkiste et al ., 2021). But evidence about this trajectory among healthcare workers, who have continued to be exposed to a very high workload related to the pandemic, is more limited and results are mixed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But evidence about this trajectory among healthcare workers, who have continued to be exposed to a very high workload related to the pandemic, is more limited and results are mixed. Some studies suggest that distress and fear/worry of Covid-19 remained high or even increased in follow-up surveys (Jordan et al ., 2021; Lopez Steinmetz et al ., 2022; McFadden et al ., 2021; Miguel-Puga et al ., 2021; Sasaki et al ., 2021) while others indicate that depression and anxiety tended to decrease at follow-up (Hirten et al ., 2020; Roberts et al ., 2021; Rodriguez et al ., 2021; Sampaio et al ., 2021; Van Steenkiste et al ., 2021). Some of these studies are based on a relatively small number of healthcare workers or on short follow-up periods (Hirten et al ., 2020; Sampaio et al ., 2021; Van Steenkiste et al ., 2021) or do not focus on specific mental disorders (Hirten et al ., 2020; Roberts et al ., 2021; Sampaio et al ., 2021; Sasaki et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social distancing and isolation may trigger numerous abnormal reactions, manifested by post-traumatic stress, anger and a sense of loss [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The pandemic has caused disturbances in everyday routines of human life [ 10 ]. People all over the world are troubled by uncertainty, job losses, isolation and separation from their families, as well as fear of getting infected and death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%