CVPR 2011 Workshops 2011
DOI: 10.1109/cvprw.2011.5981814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-sensor evaluation of three commercial iris cameras for iris biometrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each probe image, classification result is obtained from the classifier and selective enhancements are then applied to iris images according to Equations (4) to (6). For the MSI database, in Equation (4), ⊖ and ⊕ are the difference and sum operators respectively and the parameters 1 = 0.65 and 2 = 0.25.…”
Section: Iris Recognition With Camera Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each probe image, classification result is obtained from the classifier and selective enhancements are then applied to iris images according to Equations (4) to (6). For the MSI database, in Equation (4), ⊖ and ⊕ are the difference and sum operators respectively and the parameters 1 = 0.65 and 2 = 0.25.…”
Section: Iris Recognition With Camera Interoperabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Connaughton et al [6] also studied cross-camera iris recognition using two iris cameras and three different matching algorithms. They concluded that there is no clear pattern as to whether single-camera or cross-camera is better and further stated that it was the combination of the algorithm and the camera which determines the overall accuracy of an iris recognition system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In controlled environments, iris recognition is indeed extremely accurate but recent studies suggest that the iris texture is affected by covariates like pupil dilation [30] and sensor interoperability [3,11]. Presence of both textured and transparent soft contact lenses is a another issue that may cause severe degradation in iris recognition performance in terms of false non-match rate (FNMR) [4,5,35,56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the appliance, a biometric system may operate either in verification mode or identification mode [4] (Jain et al 2004),In the verification mode, a person's identity is validated through comparison between the captured biometric data and its own biometric templates stored in the database of the system. In such a system, an individual who is desirable of recognition gives a claim of identity, usually a PIN and a one-to-one comparison is done by the system to determine if claim is true or not [8] (Wayman 2001).…”
Section: Operations Of a Biometric Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first place confirmations of biometrics showed up in 29.000bc when the cave dwellers utilized their fingerprints to sign their drawings. The initially recorded proof of utilizing biometric confirmation was as a part of old Egypt [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%