2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.24.513541
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cross-species proteomic map reveals neoteny of human synapse development

Abstract: The molecular mechanisms and evolutionary changes accompanying synapse development are still poorly understood. Here, we generated a cross-species proteomic map of synapse development in the human, macaque, and mouse neocortex. By tracking the changes of >1,000 postsynaptic density (PSD) proteins from midgestation to adolescence, we found that PSD maturation in humans separates into three major phases that are dominated by distinct pathways. Cross-species comparisons reveal that the human PSD matures about … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 110 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imaging techniques provide the spatial resolution required to distinguish individual synapses and have illustrated substantial synaptic diversity for selected proteins (Zhu et al 2018; Cizeron et al 2020; S.-M. Guo et al 2019; Upmanyu et al 2022), but their limited multiplexing capabilities preclude the study of synaptic proteomes. The traditional biochemical isolation of synaptic terminals or synaptic elements (Takamori et al 2006; Bayés et al 2011; Roy et al 2018; Wang et al 2022; Wilhelm et al 2014) yields synapse-enriched fractions that can be analyzed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. These preparations, however, are often of low purity and contain a heterogenous mixture of many synapse types along with non-synaptic contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging techniques provide the spatial resolution required to distinguish individual synapses and have illustrated substantial synaptic diversity for selected proteins (Zhu et al 2018; Cizeron et al 2020; S.-M. Guo et al 2019; Upmanyu et al 2022), but their limited multiplexing capabilities preclude the study of synaptic proteomes. The traditional biochemical isolation of synaptic terminals or synaptic elements (Takamori et al 2006; Bayés et al 2011; Roy et al 2018; Wang et al 2022; Wilhelm et al 2014) yields synapse-enriched fractions that can be analyzed by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. These preparations, however, are often of low purity and contain a heterogenous mixture of many synapse types along with non-synaptic contaminants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%