2013
DOI: 10.1002/jsid.171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crosstalk model and its application to stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays

Abstract: We propose a model to quantify the crosstalk phenomenon for stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays, separate crosstalk contributed from co‐location image contrast (CIC) and system crosstalk (SCT), introduce gray scale dependency of CIC, modify model for gray scale dependency of SCT in active type 3D displays, and apply the model to derive the 3D luminance and SCT measurement formulas. The model might serve as a basis for the 3D metrology, and the results of this research should be of reference value to har… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the imperfectly isolated presentation of an image to one retinal channel can unintentionally result in that image being partially perceived by the other eye. The subjective perceptual consequence of crosstalk is typically called ‘ghosting’ or ‘bleed-through’, and its visibility is often dependent on image parameters such as contrast and luminance (Daly et al, 2011; Pastoor, 1995; Woods, 2011; Woods et al, 2010; for a detailed discussion of crosstalk metrology for stereoscopy see Abileah, 2011, 2013; Barkowsky et al, 2013; Blondé et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2013; Hurst, 2012; Woods, 2012). From the perspective of BR, it is also important to distinguish crosstalk-induced ‘ghosting/bleed-through’ from subjects’ experience of mixed percepts — i.e., perceiving a mixture of both images even with perfect dichoptic presentation (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Comparison Of Br Display Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, the imperfectly isolated presentation of an image to one retinal channel can unintentionally result in that image being partially perceived by the other eye. The subjective perceptual consequence of crosstalk is typically called ‘ghosting’ or ‘bleed-through’, and its visibility is often dependent on image parameters such as contrast and luminance (Daly et al, 2011; Pastoor, 1995; Woods, 2011; Woods et al, 2010; for a detailed discussion of crosstalk metrology for stereoscopy see Abileah, 2011, 2013; Barkowsky et al, 2013; Blondé et al, 2011; Huang et al, 2013; Hurst, 2012; Woods, 2012). From the perspective of BR, it is also important to distinguish crosstalk-induced ‘ghosting/bleed-through’ from subjects’ experience of mixed percepts — i.e., perceiving a mixture of both images even with perfect dichoptic presentation (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Comparison Of Br Display Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, the light directional autostereoscopic displays, including the lenticular lens 3D display, must precisely control the spatial light. However, in practice, there are the unavoidable light leakages from the neighbouring views [7]- [10].…”
Section: The 3d Crosstalk Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the MEVZ region, an observer is supposed to receive high uniformity and low crosstalk. Here, the acceptable value of uniformity is set higher than 80% according to European Broadcasting Union [40], while acceptable criteria of crosstalk is that the maximum crosstalk should be lower than 10% over the entire screen [31], [41], [42], [43]. Therefore, the MEVZ can be expressed as (4), which means that the viewing position ( ) ,,…”
Section: Definition Of Mevz and Bevzmentioning
confidence: 99%