2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A crowding-dependent population model for woody weeds – Where size does matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Australia, the estimated annual cost of woody weeds to the grazing industry is in the vicinity of AUD 12.3 billion [68]. Although a "trade-off" exists, the management of Z. mauritiana is largely very costly relative to the annual returns of rangeland environments (Table 2) [69,70]. A study by Zull et al (2008) constructed an analytical framework for the optimal frequency of management by synthesising the complex relationships between population dynamics, direct weed costs, and the cost-benefit of different control methods [70].…”
Section: Manual and Mechanical Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Australia, the estimated annual cost of woody weeds to the grazing industry is in the vicinity of AUD 12.3 billion [68]. Although a "trade-off" exists, the management of Z. mauritiana is largely very costly relative to the annual returns of rangeland environments (Table 2) [69,70]. A study by Zull et al (2008) constructed an analytical framework for the optimal frequency of management by synthesising the complex relationships between population dynamics, direct weed costs, and the cost-benefit of different control methods [70].…”
Section: Manual and Mechanical Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a "trade-off" exists, the management of Z. mauritiana is largely very costly relative to the annual returns of rangeland environments (Table 2) [69,70]. A study by Zull et al (2008) constructed an analytical framework for the optimal frequency of management by synthesising the complex relationships between population dynamics, direct weed costs, and the cost-benefit of different control methods [70]. This model suggested that mechanical means of management were largely uneconomic for Z. mauritiana, particularly in upland zones [70].…”
Section: Manual and Mechanical Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%