2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13071278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Crown Morphology-Based Approach to Individual Tree Detection in Subtropical Mixed Broadleaf Urban Forests Using UAV LiDAR Data

Abstract: Owing to the complex forest structure and large variation in crown size, individual tree detection in subtropical mixed broadleaf forests in urban scenes is a great challenge. Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is a powerful tool for individual tree detection due to its ability to acquire high density point cloud that can reveal three-dimensional crown structure. Tree detection based on a local maximum (LM) filter, which is applied on a canopy height model (CHM) generated from Li… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because image analysis techniques generally produce better results on conifers due to their excurrent form and apical dominance, rather than on broadleaf species with their decurrent form with multiple leaders [17,18]. Some studies have tried to improve the performance of methods like local maximum filtering, watershed, and region-growing by applying multiscale analysis [19,20] or by integrating morphological features [21,22], but generalising those models to different scenes is timeconsuming as it requires further analysis on forest features and manual adjustments on parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because image analysis techniques generally produce better results on conifers due to their excurrent form and apical dominance, rather than on broadleaf species with their decurrent form with multiple leaders [17,18]. Some studies have tried to improve the performance of methods like local maximum filtering, watershed, and region-growing by applying multiscale analysis [19,20] or by integrating morphological features [21,22], but generalising those models to different scenes is timeconsuming as it requires further analysis on forest features and manual adjustments on parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is based on the assumption that a treetop is the highest point within a crown and that the crown boundary is relatively low (Zhen et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2021). A pixel in CHM is identified as an LM when its neighbouring pixels have a lower height value (Koch et al, 2006;Plakman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Ethical Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predicted living tree densities were based on the treetops of dominant trees, which were detected using fixed-window-size local-maxima (LM) filtering (Popescu and Wynne, 2004; Gebreslasie et al, 2011) applied to the Canopy Height Model (CHM) acquired from Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data (obtained from airborne laser scanning with a density of 4 points per m 2 ; https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/en/data/lidar-measurements-lidar). This method is based on the assumption that a treetop is the highest point within a crown and that the crown boundary is relatively low (Zhen et al, 2016; Xu et al, 2021). A pixel in CHM is identified as an LM when its neighbouring pixels have a lower height value (Koch et al, 2006; Plakman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Remote Data – Prediction Of Density Of Living Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the main sensors used in UAVs are the LIDAR and RGB cameras, which are widely employed in UGS investigation. Although LIDAR sensors perform well in urban vegetation inventorying [31][32][33], the disadvantages of high cost and complex operation limit their application at large scales. Compared with the LIDAR sensor, RGB sensors mounted on a UAV are more suitable for large scale vegetation parameter measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%