“…Given that the geochronological, geochemical and even grain morphological characteristics of zircon minerals from crystalline source regions are becoming well established in southern Australia, refined sediment tracking of primary and recycled components, as well as basin correlations, are becoming increasingly possible (Barham, Kirkland, & Danišík, ; Barham et al, , ; Cawood & Nemchin, ; Cawood, Nemchin, Freeman, & Sircombe, ; Haines, Wingate, & Kirkland, ; Lloyd et al, ; MacDonald et al, ; Makulini, Kirkland, & Barham, ; Olierook et al, ; Sircombe & Freeman, ; Veevers, Belousova, & Saeed, ; Veevers, Saeed, Belousova, & Griffin, ). Although the geology of East Antarctica is largely inaccessible due to ice‐cover, extended Australia‐Antarctica connection prior to rifting means many of the major Australian crystalline basement elements are shared with the pre‐rifted adjacent Antarctic margin (Aitken et al, ; Barham, Kirkland, & Hollis, ; Fitzsimons, ; Morrissey, Hand, & Kelsey, ; Morrissey, Payne et al, ). Recent work on Proterozoic to Cenozoic depocentres around the central southern margin of Australia have increased understanding of clastic sediment dynamics in the region and shown remarkable stability of the detrital zircon fingerprint that supports extensive recycling and sustained source to sink connections for extended periods (Barham et al, , ; Haines et al, ; Hou et al, ; Lloyd et al, ; MacDonald et al, ; Reid, Keeling, Boyd, Belousova, & Hou, ; Spaggiari, Kirkland, Smithies, Wingate, & Belousova, ; Veevers et al, ).…”