2012
DOI: 10.1558/jmea.v25i1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Cycladic Perspective on Mycenaean Long-Distance Exchanges

Abstract: Recent discussions of Mycenaean long-distance exchanges with the ‘East’ have focused on the goods exchanged, their means of production and shipment, and their significance for consumers. Despite voluminous research on these topics, consideration of Mycenaean long-distance exchanges with the eastern Mediterranean vis-à-vis the Cycladic islands during the Palatial Period has been minimal. Diachronic examination of the Late Bronze Age archaeological evidence from the Cyclades reveals the absence of certain defini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the examples described above pave the way to employing a third archaeological concept, referred to as “negative archaeology.” In general, negative archaeology studies find a meaning for what is absent 87,88 : what did not happen; what did happen but was rendered undetectable 89 ; what will not occur again 88 ; and the ignored body of data, 89 among other options. It is a matter of identifying, locating, and manifesting some sort of silent evidence of past history.…”
Section: Negative Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the examples described above pave the way to employing a third archaeological concept, referred to as “negative archaeology.” In general, negative archaeology studies find a meaning for what is absent 87,88 : what did not happen; what did happen but was rendered undetectable 89 ; what will not occur again 88 ; and the ignored body of data, 89 among other options. It is a matter of identifying, locating, and manifesting some sort of silent evidence of past history.…”
Section: Negative Archaeologymentioning
confidence: 99%