2020
DOI: 10.14740/jocmr4029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dashboard Prototype for Tracking the Impact of Diabetes on Hospital Readmissions Using a National Administrative Database

Abstract: Background: Over the past several decades, diabetes mellitus has contributed to a significant disease burden in the general population. Evidence suggests that patients with a coexisting diabetes diagnosis consume more hospital resources, and have higher readmission rates compared to those who do not. Against the backdrop of bundled-payment programs, healthcare systems cannot underestimate the importance of monitoring patient health information at the population level. Methods: Using the data from the Centers f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, introduction of a dashboard in a primary care setting improved frequency of health screening items including cancer, diabetes and smoking [ 16 ]. On a larger scale, dashboards have been implemented for tracking national data including the impact of diabetes on hospital readmissions and opioid-related adverse events [ 10 , 11 ]. A common conundrum is that individual institutions are able to collect their own data and compare to national benchmarks, but lack other peer groups, such as local or regional hospitals with which to compare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, introduction of a dashboard in a primary care setting improved frequency of health screening items including cancer, diabetes and smoking [ 16 ]. On a larger scale, dashboards have been implemented for tracking national data including the impact of diabetes on hospital readmissions and opioid-related adverse events [ 10 , 11 ]. A common conundrum is that individual institutions are able to collect their own data and compare to national benchmarks, but lack other peer groups, such as local or regional hospitals with which to compare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%