2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data-driven approach to quality assessment for hyperspectral systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within model 1, the R 2 values between some SVIs and NEE showed variations among the three different flights (e.g., NDVI performance was much better in flight 3 in respect to the other two flights). Such variations very likely result from uncertainties which are typically associated with both EC flux [49][50][51] and spectral measurements [52,53], and from the constrained number of tower observations per flight available in the study. However, distinctive results were shown by both model 1 and model 2.…”
Section: Chlorophyll and Structural Controls On Ecosystem Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within model 1, the R 2 values between some SVIs and NEE showed variations among the three different flights (e.g., NDVI performance was much better in flight 3 in respect to the other two flights). Such variations very likely result from uncertainties which are typically associated with both EC flux [49][50][51] and spectral measurements [52,53], and from the constrained number of tower observations per flight available in the study. However, distinctive results were shown by both model 1 and model 2.…”
Section: Chlorophyll and Structural Controls On Ecosystem Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that hyperspectral image (HSI) statistics tend to display "heavy tails" (Manolakis2003)(Theiler2005), rendering most of the projection pursuit methods hard to use. Taking into consideration the magnitude of described deviations of observed data PDFs from normal distribution, it is apparent that a priori knowledge of variance in data caused by the imaging system is to be employed in order to efficiently classify objects on HSIs (Kerr, 2015), especially in cases of wildly varying SNR. A number of attempts to describe this variance and compensating techniques has been made (Aiazzi2006), however, new data quality standards are not yet set and accounting for the detector response is made under large set of assumptions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%