2017
DOI: 10.1002/oca.2381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data‐driven approximate solution to the model‐free HJB equation

Abstract: Summary It is generally impossible to analytically solve the Hamilton‐Jacobi‐Bellman (HJB) equation of an optimal control system. With the coming of the big‐data era, this paper first derives a new data‐driven and model‐free Hamilton function for the HJB equation. Then, a data‐driven tracking differentiator method is proposed to solve the Hamilton function. Finally, the simulation for a classic example shows that the optimal control policy can be approximated with the proposed method. Thus, an online data‐driv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key challenge would be how to formulate a more sophisticated model without using unnecessarily complex coefficients. Enhancing data‐driven nature of the model and the management policy 102 is also an option for improving usefulness of the presented model. The presented framework of the uncertainty‐averse modeling is closely linked with the risk‐averse ones 103,104 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key challenge would be how to formulate a more sophisticated model without using unnecessarily complex coefficients. Enhancing data‐driven nature of the model and the management policy 102 is also an option for improving usefulness of the presented model. The presented framework of the uncertainty‐averse modeling is closely linked with the risk‐averse ones 103,104 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, compared with the KECA method, 25 the TKPLS method, 11 the TPCR method, 4 and the PLS method, 12 the feasibility of the proposed algorithm is illustrated under two selected scenarios (IDV(1) and IDV( 4)). For these two scenarios, the input matrix U is composed of XMEAS and XMV (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11), and then the KPI variable Y is set as XMEAS(35). The parameters are given as A = 17, c = 10 3 , 𝛼 = 0.95, and 𝜉 = 6.…”
Section: Simulation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advances in storing hardware, data-driven methods are exploited largely in industrial systems and engineering. [1][2][3][4][5] The multivariable statistics (MS) approach, as the common data-driven method, reduces the high-dimensional data into a lower-dimensional representation to avoid the "curse of dimensionality.". [6][7][8] Many successful extensions of the MS method have been generated via the principal component analysis (PCA) method and the partial least squares (PLS) method into the fault detection and diagnosis field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Reference 6, a data‐based Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman function is proposed, and a data‐based model‐free approximate solution of the HJB equation is realized. In Reference 7, the dynamic linearization method is proposed to transform the strong nonlinear system into a linear data model. Then the model‐free adaptive control (MFAC) method is proposed by using the optimization method, which is an effective data‐based method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%