2021
DOI: 10.1007/s42979-021-00518-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data-Driven Heart Disease Prediction Model Through K-Means Clustering-Based Anomaly Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various events' conditional and marginal probabilities are compared by the Naïve Bayes algorithm. For the given samples, this algorithm is useful for calculating the possible nearest value [17]. e Bayes theorem is useful for calculating the diagnostic probability when the patient's health is monitored based on a few symptoms.…”
Section: Naïve Bayes Weighted Approach (Nbwa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various events' conditional and marginal probabilities are compared by the Naïve Bayes algorithm. For the given samples, this algorithm is useful for calculating the possible nearest value [17]. e Bayes theorem is useful for calculating the diagnostic probability when the patient's health is monitored based on a few symptoms.…”
Section: Naïve Bayes Weighted Approach (Nbwa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Angelin 19 represented a k ‐means clustering‐based outlier detection approach in a medical healthcare dataset, in which they modified k ‐means clustering using the dragon fly optimization algorithm. Ripan et al 8 proposed a k ‐means clustering‐based anomaly detection model in a heart disease dataset. In this study, they set max threshold and min threshold scores to detect anomalies within clusters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we implemented the whole outlier detection process with DBSCAN and k ‐means again. For k ‐means we followed our previous study approach 8 . After that, we removed those outliers and compared precision, recall, and accuracy as before.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations