2019
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A data‐driven particle filter for terrain based navigation of sensor‐limited autonomous underwater vehicles

Abstract: In this article a new Data-Driven formulation of the Particle Filter framework is proposed. The new formulation is able to learn an approximate proposal distribution from previous data. By doing so, the need to explicitly model all the disturbances that might affect the system is relaxed. Such characteristics are particularly suited for Terrain Based Navigation for sensor-limited AUVs, where typical scenarios often include non-negligible sources of noise affecting the system, which are unknown and hard to mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cohen et al [74] proposed an end-to-end deep learning approach to estimate the velocity of an AUV instead of a traditional filter, using only INS and DVL, which improved the effectiveness by 66-87% over the traditional model-based approach. Melo et al [75] proposed a data-driven particle filter, where sonar sensors are limited and cannot be modeled. The method learns from previous data to obtain an approximate estimated distribution, and it has relatively high accuracy and efficiency with a 40% lower data resampling frequency and 17% less running time than the traditional method.…”
Section: ) Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohen et al [74] proposed an end-to-end deep learning approach to estimate the velocity of an AUV instead of a traditional filter, using only INS and DVL, which improved the effectiveness by 66-87% over the traditional model-based approach. Melo et al [75] proposed a data-driven particle filter, where sonar sensors are limited and cannot be modeled. The method learns from previous data to obtain an approximate estimated distribution, and it has relatively high accuracy and efficiency with a 40% lower data resampling frequency and 17% less running time than the traditional method.…”
Section: ) Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been proposed using neural networks [35][36][37][38], the support vector machine [39][40][41], hidden Markov model [42][43][44], fuzzy inference system [45,46], relevance vector machine [47,48], and long short-term memory networks [49][50][51]. Most of them are based on data-driven approaches [52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By doing so, they need to explicitly model all the disturbances that might affect the system. Such characteristics are particularly suited for terrain‐based navigation for sensor‐limited AUVs, where typical scenarios often include non‐negligible sources of noise affecting the system, which are unknown and hard to model [4]. Louise proposed a sliding mode control (SMC) law, specifically the super‐twisting algorithm with adaptive gains, for the trajectory tracking of the underwater swimming manipulator centre of mass.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%