2011
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m111.010728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Data Processing Pipeline for Mammalian Proteome Dynamics Studies Using Stable Isotope Metabolic Labeling

Abstract: In a recent study, in vivo metabolic labeling using 15 N traced the rate of label incorporation among more than 1700 proteins simultaneously and enabled the determination of individual protein turnover rate constants over a dynamic range of three orders of magnitude (Price, J. C., Guan, S., Burlingame, A., Prusiner, S. B., and Ghaemmaghami, S. (2010) Analysis of proteome dynamics in the mouse brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 107, 14508 -14513). These studies of protein dynamics provide a deeper understan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
161
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Data Processing-Peaklists were generated with PAVA, an inhouse software (35). Database searches were performed using Protein Prospector (version 5.9.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data Processing-Peaklists were generated with PAVA, an inhouse software (35). Database searches were performed using Protein Prospector (version 5.9.0).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L and H formed two separate populations by a nonnegative least square approach as described previously (Guan et al, 2011;Nelson et al, 2014). All filters used for partial 15 N labeling were kept (Nelson et al, 2014) and two more filters were applied: First, a minimum 80% 15 N enrichment was required to disregard quantifications with high noise level between L and H; second, a minimum signal-to-noise ratio of 5 was used to disregard high neighboring noise contribution to L and H. A total of 432 Agilent .d files were further processed by Trans Proteomic Pipeline to get protein probabilities for identification.…”
Section: Determining Changes In Specific Protein Abundance Over 5 D Umentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters for peptide identification were trypsin cleavage specificity with 1 missed cleavage allowed, 0 non-tryptic termini, monoisotopic precursors, 20-ppm precursor maximum mass error, 0.6-Da fragment ion maximum mass error, ϩ2 or ϩ3 precursor charge state, fixed carbamidomethylation of Cys residues, variable deamidation of Asn and Gln residues, variable oxidation of Met residues, and variable conversion of peptide N-terminal Gln residues to pyroglutamic acid. Following Batch-Tag, a list of identified GFAP peptides was generated using the Search Compare module, and subsequent data analysis was performed using a data processing pipeline for mammalian proteome dynamics studies created by S. Guan and coworkers (25,28).…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry and Data Analysis Of Silam Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational data analysis was performed using a series of previously described data processing modules (25,28 Figure 1. Peptides used for in vitro and in vivo GFAP kinetic studies.…”
Section: Gfapmentioning
confidence: 99%