2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13039-016-0267-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A de novo duplication of chromosome 9q34.13-qter in a fetus with Tetralogy of Fallot Syndrome

Abstract: BackgroundPartial duplications of the distal 9q have been rarely reported in literatures. The key features included characteristic facial appearance, long fingers and toes, slight psychomotor retardation, heart murmur et al. But rare severe congenital heart defects (CHD) such as TOF were reported to be associated with 9qter duplications.Case presentationA 23-year-old woman was referred for genetic counseling and prenatal diagnosis at 253/7 weeks of gestation due to her male fetus, diagnosed as Tetralogy of Fal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All genomic coordinates were taken from the human reference sequence. Genes and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) references were from RefSeq and OMIM entries, respectively (Liu et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All genomic coordinates were taken from the human reference sequence. Genes and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) references were from RefSeq and OMIM entries, respectively (Liu et al., 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genes and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) references were from Ref-Seq and OMIM entries, respectively. The theoretical values for the detection of a single copy gain or loss were applied as previously reported [13,14].…”
Section: Cma Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SNP array was performed using Affymetrix CytoScan®750 K Array (Affymetrix Inc, CA, USA), according to the manufacturers protocol. The theoretical values for the detection of a single copy gain or loss are described as previously reported [9,10].…”
Section: Cma Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%