2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-015-0315-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decentralized Fuzzy Learning Algorithm for Pursuit-Evasion Differential Games with Superior Evaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluate the proposed algorithm over a number of multi-pursuer single-superior-evader pursuit-evasion differential games, and the results validate the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm is published in [139].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the proposed algorithm over a number of multi-pursuer single-superior-evader pursuit-evasion differential games, and the results validate the proposed algorithm. The proposed algorithm is published in [139].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned earlier, although there are numerous papers discussing different methods, including learning methods to solve the problem of the PE game with slow evaders, there are only a few that address multi-player PE differential games with superior evaders [8,[23][24][25][132][133][134][135][136]. The authors in [8] proposed a sufficiency condition to capture superior evaders.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This learning algorithm is based on the condition that was proposed in [8], as well as a specific formation control strategy. The second learning algorithm [136] is based on fuzzy-reinforcement learning with Apollonius circles and a modified formation control strategy. The goal of a superior evader is to learn how to reach a specific target, and the goal of the pursuers is to learn how to cooperate to capture the superior evader.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations