2009
DOI: 10.1080/13669870902970236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision analytic approach for technology portfolio prioritization: aviation safety applications

Abstract: A decision analytic approach for evaluating new aviation safety products and technologies is developed and demonstrated to consolidate five existing program assessment metrics to develop a unified metric that simultaneously considers the relative importance and contribution of each. This allows for a meaningful and objective evaluation and comparison of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Aviation Safety Program (AvSP) advanced aeronautical products and technologies. The resulting decision… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the patent literature has treated patent stocks as largely homogenous, characterizing them using structural features like size/novelty or market reach, it has ignored risk assessments that are an important topic in technology management literature (Crawford 1987, Urban/Hauser 1993. Following insights from portfolio theory, the main proposition is that firms should not regard their technologies in isolation, but as a portfolio (Kfir 2000, Lin and Chen 2005, Sharma et al 2009, Wooje et al 2013. The decisive aspect of the portfolio idea is that it may act as a "hedge" against risks, because even if one technology fails, another in the portfolio might succeed (Abernathy/Rosenbloom, 1968, Klingebiel andRammer, 2014).…”
Section: Risk Of the Technology Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the patent literature has treated patent stocks as largely homogenous, characterizing them using structural features like size/novelty or market reach, it has ignored risk assessments that are an important topic in technology management literature (Crawford 1987, Urban/Hauser 1993. Following insights from portfolio theory, the main proposition is that firms should not regard their technologies in isolation, but as a portfolio (Kfir 2000, Lin and Chen 2005, Sharma et al 2009, Wooje et al 2013. The decisive aspect of the portfolio idea is that it may act as a "hedge" against risks, because even if one technology fails, another in the portfolio might succeed (Abernathy/Rosenbloom, 1968, Klingebiel andRammer, 2014).…”
Section: Risk Of the Technology Basementioning
confidence: 99%