2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision framework proposal for customer order prioritization: A case study for a structural steel company

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique relies on graph theory, and facilitates analyzing difficult problems using a visualization method. DEMATEL, a decision-making approach is not only capable of uncovering relationships among factors influencing other factors but also capable of illustrating the structure of complex causal relationships (Akyildiz et al , 2015). Compared to other multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches like AHP and TOPSIS, it is not possible to determine the cause and effect relationships among the factors by these techniques (Luthra et al , 2013; Mangla et al , 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique relies on graph theory, and facilitates analyzing difficult problems using a visualization method. DEMATEL, a decision-making approach is not only capable of uncovering relationships among factors influencing other factors but also capable of illustrating the structure of complex causal relationships (Akyildiz et al , 2015). Compared to other multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches like AHP and TOPSIS, it is not possible to determine the cause and effect relationships among the factors by these techniques (Luthra et al , 2013; Mangla et al , 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, these factors are potentially conflicting and intertwined and cannot be treated as independent. Due to these interdependencies, the factors that individually less significant, may become more important when assessed collectively (Akyildiz, Kadaifci, & Topcu, 2015). Third, multiple decision makers are involved in the process of energy planning and their diverse opinion needs to be taken into account in the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of exploiting powerful multiple criteria decision making approaches is indispensable for healthcare organizations while evaluating different alternatives in the presence of varying types of criteria like many researchers wrote for industry and for banking sector (Kucukaltan, 2016;Akyıldız, 2015, Onar, 2019Gul, 2018).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper developed the concepts of exploiting powerful multiple criteria decision-making approaches (Kucukaltan, 2016;Akyıldız, 2015, Onar, 2019Gul, 2018;Mutalimov et al, 2020). It evaluate different alternatives in the presence of varying types of criteria such as: HIV spread rate, government spending, and the number of concluded contracts.…”
Section: Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%