2010
DOI: 10.1504/ejie.2010.029571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision-making framework for process plant maintenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The priority vector is a goal-programming model with three goals: global scores of maintenance policies, local scores of maintenance policies based on risk contribution, and local scores of maintenance policies based on cost. In [34], Ghosh and Roy (2010) use the worst-case failure mode to calculate criticality of equipment, and with this information they prioritize maintenance activity. They then use fuzzy AHP and a goal-programming model to optimize the goals of risk reduction and cost minimization.…”
Section: Emissions and Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The priority vector is a goal-programming model with three goals: global scores of maintenance policies, local scores of maintenance policies based on risk contribution, and local scores of maintenance policies based on cost. In [34], Ghosh and Roy (2010) use the worst-case failure mode to calculate criticality of equipment, and with this information they prioritize maintenance activity. They then use fuzzy AHP and a goal-programming model to optimize the goals of risk reduction and cost minimization.…”
Section: Emissions and Penaltiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a related piece of work in the field of techno-economic optimization of process plant maintenance, the decision-making framework for an overall maintenance approach has been modeled using a fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making approach (Ghosh, 2008). However, for further improvement in decision-making, both the reliability of a system (constrained to be above a minimum permissible level) as well as the risk that would result as a consequence of a random equipment failure need (constrained to be below a maximum permissible level) to be considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researches on technical asset-related activities have been treated extensively in the literature such as researches on maintenance and its strategy (Tsang, 1998;Mather, 2005;Pinjala et al, 2006); performance measurement and optimization (Dekker and Scarf, 1998;Garg and Deshmukh, 2006); replacement and remaining asset life determination (Jardine and Tsang, 2013;Zuashkiani and Jardine, 2013;Wijnia et al, 2007;Scarf et al, 2007;Oien, 1998), maintenance outsourcing (Cruz and Rinco, 2012;Wang, 2010;Martin, 1997;Buczkowski et al, 2005); maintenance process planning, task and task interval selection (Ghosh and Roy, 2010;Mckone and Weiss, 2002;Khan and Haddara 2003); planning, scheduling and information management (Satyanarayana and Prasad, 1996;Nagarur and Kaewplang, 1999;Tsang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Engineering Asset Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%