2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2010.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision-making system for construction site layout planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The population size of 200, the present model generated an optimal plan. The model was used to evaluate the fitness (construction logistics cost) by performing the following steps for each solution examined by the GA optimization tool in order to calculate: (1) the order quantities of each material during every stage based on the generated FOP and the material's demand in that stage; (2) the ordering costs based on the order quantities identified in step 1 and the suppliers purchase and delivery costs; (3) the financing cost using Equation 3 based on the cumulative materials demand and the cumulative supply which is dependent on the FOP values; (4) the stock-out cost using Equation 6 throughout calculating the material-related project delay (MRPD); (6) the storage space needs and dimensions for each material in every stage based on the planner-defined footprint schedules and the value of the FOP; and (7) the layout costs using Equations 6 through 9 considering the values of layout decision variables (locations and orientations) for all storage areas and temporary facilities [21,22]. The present CLC model requires construction planners to provide the following input data for the available case study: (1) the construction site geometry including the dimensions and locations of buildings under construction and site boundaries; (2) the project stages and cumulative demand of each material over time as an ASCII file format; (3) the dimensions and relocation costs of each temporary facility as Table 5: Footprint area of materials storage and temporary facilities.…”
Section: Clc Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The population size of 200, the present model generated an optimal plan. The model was used to evaluate the fitness (construction logistics cost) by performing the following steps for each solution examined by the GA optimization tool in order to calculate: (1) the order quantities of each material during every stage based on the generated FOP and the material's demand in that stage; (2) the ordering costs based on the order quantities identified in step 1 and the suppliers purchase and delivery costs; (3) the financing cost using Equation 3 based on the cumulative materials demand and the cumulative supply which is dependent on the FOP values; (4) the stock-out cost using Equation 6 throughout calculating the material-related project delay (MRPD); (6) the storage space needs and dimensions for each material in every stage based on the planner-defined footprint schedules and the value of the FOP; and (7) the layout costs using Equations 6 through 9 considering the values of layout decision variables (locations and orientations) for all storage areas and temporary facilities [21,22]. The present CLC model requires construction planners to provide the following input data for the available case study: (1) the construction site geometry including the dimensions and locations of buildings under construction and site boundaries; (2) the project stages and cumulative demand of each material over time as an ASCII file format; (3) the dimensions and relocation costs of each temporary facility as Table 5: Footprint area of materials storage and temporary facilities.…”
Section: Clc Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Construction site layout planning (CSLP) has been found to be a critical task in construction planning by experts and this task is emphasized on implementing early in the planning phase [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 that is employed for evaluation and selection of construction site layout [20]. Azadeh et al [21] employed data envelopment analysis (DEA) for calculating the efficiency of the considered maintenance workshop layout of a gas transmission unit, then these alternative layouts were ranked and the most efficient layout was specified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%