2016
DOI: 10.3390/su8100990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decision Making Tool for a Comprehensive Evaluation of Building Retrofitting Actions at the Regional Scale

Abstract: Buildings in Europe account for 40% of total primary energy consumption and 36% of CO 2 emissions. Nearly one-half of the building stock was built before modern energy efficiency standards and need urgent renovation. Urban retrofitting has emerged as a crucial factor for bringing about a radical change, the new construction rate being lower than 1%. Nevertheless, an accepted and consolidated methodology for refurbishing the existing housing stock is still lacking. The study presents an operating methodology fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next step, tools requiring complex energy simulation tools such as EnergyPlus [15] and DOE 2.0 [16] were excluded. Retrofit tools with the purpose of building energy calculation on either district [17], city [18] or regional [19] levels were also excluded and only the scale of single buildings was considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next step, tools requiring complex energy simulation tools such as EnergyPlus [15] and DOE 2.0 [16] were excluded. Retrofit tools with the purpose of building energy calculation on either district [17], city [18] or regional [19] levels were also excluded and only the scale of single buildings was considered.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, identifying the most appropriate combination of retrofit solutions required to meet targets can be extremely complex [8]. Many studies have been undertaken to provide methodologies to support the selection of appropriate retrofit solutions for domestic properties [9][10][11][12][13] but in practice it is proving difficult to implement these on a scale that will achieve the targets set due to the large number of barriers. Properties constructed during different time periods pose different retrofit challenges due to the materials available, construction methods and needs of the population at the time of construction and this is also true for dwelling in different locations.…”
Section: Million Tonnesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net present value and the payback period of the retrofit process were chosen as objectives along with the energy savings and emissions reductions. Albatici et al [22] developed a decision making for comprehensive building retrofit evaluation, which was demonstrated in social housing buildings in Italy. The tool uses an optimization methodology based on energy efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and thermal comfort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%