2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision-making tool to maximize chances of meeting project commitments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers used the Bayesian Network (BN) modelling framework for assessing project risk and uncertainty [21][22][23][24]. Nguyen et al [25] developed ProRisk methodology which serves as a decisionmaking tool to choose the best risk treatment strategy. In [26], authors used a probabilistic fuzzy method and fuzzy IF-THEN rules for innovative project risk assessment while Rodríguez et al [27] employed a combination of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) for assessing risks of information technology projects.…”
Section: Methods For Assessment and Management Of Risk And Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers used the Bayesian Network (BN) modelling framework for assessing project risk and uncertainty [21][22][23][24]. Nguyen et al [25] developed ProRisk methodology which serves as a decisionmaking tool to choose the best risk treatment strategy. In [26], authors used a probabilistic fuzzy method and fuzzy IF-THEN rules for innovative project risk assessment while Rodríguez et al [27] employed a combination of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) for assessing risks of information technology projects.…”
Section: Methods For Assessment and Management Of Risk And Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For large engineering projects, a network theory based approach was presented in to deal with the interdependencies between negative risks and to better understand their potential interactions by using network theory indicators in project risk analysis. In Nguyen et al (2013), the ProRisk methodology has been developed to provide to project managers a decision making tool to select the best risk treatment strategy. In the same context, in Fan et al (2008) an analytical model based on a conceptual framework that describes the quantitative relationships between risk-handling strategy and the various project characteristics (technical complexity, project size, slack) has been proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk is described as an event, which has occurrence characteristics (potentiality to occur) and consequence characteristics on the project objectives (impact in the event of occurrence). Nguyen et al [25] propose Prorisk, which can model and evaluate the impact of risks on the project cost and the schedule cost. They define the concepts of risk scenario, treatment scenario and project scenario.…”
Section: Dealing With Project Risk Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, when the project scenarios are known it is possible to obtain their durations and costs. The approach called ProRisk proposed in [25] is then used to generate E ScP v . For each project scenario, the calculation of the probability, the cost and the duration take into account the potential modifications induced by the achievement of treatment strategies at the schedule level.…”
Section: (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%