2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision model to allocate protective safety barriers and mitigate domino effects

Abstract: In this paper, we present a model to support decision-makers about where to locate safety barriers and mitigate the consequences of an accident triggering cascade effects. Based on the features of an industrial area that may be affected by domino accidents, and knowing the characteristics of the safety barriers that can be installed to stall the fire propagation between installations, the decision model can help practitioners in their decision-making. The model can be effectively used to decide how to allocate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Being in line with the hypothesis of Seveso-induced domino effect studies in Europe, as can be seen from Figure 2, European countries being Italy, Belgium, and The Netherlands are mainly affiliated with the research, followed by India and Canada. The connections between the nodes represent respective collaboration, with the highest collaborations between Belgium and TheNetherlands (e.g.,Janssens et al, 2015), Italy and Canada (e.g.,Khakzad et al, 2013), and India and Iran (e.g.,Abdolhamidzadeh et al, 2010). The countries with the highest contribution/cooperation in the domain of domino effects in the chemical industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being in line with the hypothesis of Seveso-induced domino effect studies in Europe, as can be seen from Figure 2, European countries being Italy, Belgium, and The Netherlands are mainly affiliated with the research, followed by India and Canada. The connections between the nodes represent respective collaboration, with the highest collaborations between Belgium and TheNetherlands (e.g.,Janssens et al, 2015), Italy and Canada (e.g.,Khakzad et al, 2013), and India and Iran (e.g.,Abdolhamidzadeh et al, 2010). The countries with the highest contribution/cooperation in the domain of domino effects in the chemical industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of decision analysis techniques have been used for cost‐effective safety management of major accidents in the process/chemical industry, including analytic hierarchical process, limited memory influence diagrams, and linear programming …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of decision analysis techniques have been used for cost-effective safety management of major accidents in the process/chemical industry, including analytic hierarchical process, (79,80) limited memory influence diagrams, (81) and linear programming. (31,82) Due to the conflicting nature of the influential decision criteria, however, it is usually unlikely to find a decision (i.e., a set of decision variables) that satisfies the influential criteria altogether. A Paretooptimal solution is a set of decision variables for which there is no other solution where the value of a criterion can be improved without either worsening the value of other criteria or at least keeping them unchanged.…”
Section: Multicriteria Decision Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies on the risk reduction process mostly propose methods or tools that manage [19], analyse [20] or assess [21] preventive measures. These articles help designers to compare and choose the safety measures to be integrated in their design.…”
Section: Literature Review 21 On the Design Processmentioning
confidence: 99%