A decision support approach for the evaluation of transport investment alternatives

Caliskan, N

doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.035

Cited by 40 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ferrari (2003) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X Sayers et al (2003) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X Yedla and Shrestha (2003) Choice of technologies X X X XX X Brucker et al (2004) Choice of technologies X X X X Not specified Ellis et al (2004) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X Macharis et al (2004) Choice of technologies X X X X X X Tzeng et al (2005) Choice of "clean technologies" for vehicles X X X X X X X X Caliskan (2006) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X Tudela et al (2006) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X Ahern and Anandarajah (2007) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X X X Brey et al (2007) Choice of technologies X X X X Fioravanti et al (2007) Investment on infrastructure for transport systems X X X X X X X X Kavran et al (2007) Choice of technologies X X X X X X Tavares-Pereira et al (2007) Partition of districts for an IPTS X X X X…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2. Other authors, classified in this category, proposed multi-criteria analysis based on computer simulation(Bielli 1992), bi-criteria linear programming(Teng and Tzeng 1998), ideal point approaches(Tsamboulas et al 1999), logic programming(Baita et al 2000), cognitive maps(Ülengin and Topcu 2000;Caliskan 2006), Goal Achievement Technique(Khasnabis et al 2002), Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis or FHA(Panou and Sofianos 2002), exponential function of the geometrical mean method(Yedla and Shrestha 2003), optimization using weighted sums(Sayers et al 2003), 0-1 goal programming (Wey and Wu 2007), weighted integer goal programming (Ahern and Anandarajah 2007), graph theory (Tavares-Pereira et al 2007), Direct Rating Method (Fioravanti et al 2007), MDCA-C or Multiple analysis criteria (Rodrigues da Silva et al 2008), lexicographical method (Zografos and Androutsopoulos 2008), linear probability model (Estache et al 2009), Dempster Shafer theory (Awasthi and Chauhan 2011), attribute weighting(Keshkamat et al 2009), multicriteria decision analysis and spatial data exploration (ESDA)(Rybarczyk and Wu 2010), nonlinear programming(Wang et al 2011), survey instrument for evaluating service quality (SERVQUAL)(Awasthi et al 2011a), multi-criteria method called "Rembrandt" (Ratio Estimation in Magnitudes or deci-Bells to Rate Alternatives which are non-dominated)(Barfod 2012) and the statistical multinomial model logit(He and Hung 2012).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Megacities around the world are highly concerned about the impacts of urban transportation. The rapid urbanization and motorization in megacities have a direct impact on sustainable development. Hence, it is very frequently to find the multiple actors from both private and public sectors involved in the design and operation of urban passenger transportation systems to make decisions that seek at optimizing their own particular objectives. However, urban passenger transport system is a very complex task involving multiple criteria related to economic, environmental and socio-political issues. Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques actually aid the decision making process by assessing such problems. This paper presents a review of research papers published between 1982 and 2014 (up to May) concerning MCDM for the design and operation of urban passenger transport systems. From the analysis over more than 30 years, the current paper highlights the importance of taking into account the multiplicity of actors and their own decision criteria, as well as the resolution technique. Finally, some suggestions for future research are discussed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…of social, environmental or technical character. These features constitute major assets of this methodology (Figueira, Greco, & Ehrgott, 2005;Caliskan, 2006;Cascajo, 2005). Therefore, in many reports authors present practical applications of MCDM/A methodology for analysis, evaluation and ranking of specific transportation-related investments (De Brucker, 2011;Caliskan, 2006;Cascajo, 2005;Gercek, Karpak, & Kilincaslon, 1998;Hayashi & Morisugi, 2000;Kruszynski, 2014;Morisugi, 2000).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Transportation Projectsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This objectification and transparent way of caring out the evaluation accounting for multiple aspects are especially valuable for analyzing transportation projects (Kruszynski, 2014). Therefore, in many reports authors present practical applications of MCDM/A methodology for analysis, evaluation and ranking of specific transportation-related investments (Gercek, Karpak, & Kilincaslon, 1998;Caliskan, 2006;Cascajo, 2005;Hayashi & Morisugi, 2000;Morisugi, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Assessment and selection of the proposed improvements and their variants necessitate analysis with the use of selected methodologies which provide appropriate tools (methods) (Beder, 2000;Belton & Stewart, 2002). Evaluation and selection of transportation projects (TP-s) (especially infrastructural ones) constitutes an important decision-making topic and is widely discussed in professional literature (Caliskan, 2006;Cascajo, 2005;Cascetta, 2009;Kruszynski, 2014;Zak, 2005). In the case of urban transportation, this problem is often interconnected with budget planning for a huge agglomeration and prioritizing the implementation of specific transportation-related investments.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV Methods to Multiple Level, Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Urban Transportation Projects

Żak

Kruszyński

2015

Transportation Research Procedia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper the authors carry out a multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of 18 urban transportation projects. At each level of the hierarchical decision problem different multiple criteria ranking sub-problems have been structured and solved with the application of AHP method, ELECTRE III/IV method and their combination (AHP/ELECTRE III/IV). Thus, the computational phase allowed for testing the above mentioned multiple criteria ranking methods, i. e.: AHP and ELECTRE III/IV and analyzing their suitability for performing a multiple level, multiple criteria evaluation of transportation projects. Due to axiomatic differences between methods alternative aggregation formulas of the generated rankings by ELECTRE III/IV and AHP methods have been proposed. A multi -aspect discussion and comparison of generated results and applied methods have been presented.

show abstract

IMPACTS OF BOSPORUS BRIDGES oN THE ISTANBUL METROPOLITAN SETTLEMENT AREAS

Geymen

2011

Land Degrad Dev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Istanbul, one of the largest metropolitan cities in the world, experienced rapid industrialization and urbanization in the second-half of the 20th century. The City grew at an average annual growth rate of 4.5 per cent between 1950 and 2000. Growth of settlements and the transportation system have damaged the natural environment. Istanbul is located on both sides of the Bosporus Strait that divides Europe from Asia. Recently an alternative to the planned third bridge for the Istanbul metropolitan area has been selected. The transportation infrastructure which has been constructed has drastically changed the land use profile and caused negative impacts on the environment. The proposed third bridge route threatens agricultural areas, forests, waterbodies and water collection areas that form the open-space systems of Istanbul.The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of existing Bosporus bridges on the spatial development and the natural resources of the metropolitan area of Istanbul. With the new transportation axis focused on the bridge route, the potential impacts on vital open spaces such as the northern forest regions, the existing agricultural lands and the waterbodies and catchments are evaluated. These changes are explored using a geographical information system and five sets of Landsat satellite images from 1975, 1990, 1995, 2000 and 2005. This should provide a better understanding of the main reasons for the effects and will support city administrators planning similar projects.

show abstract

A decision support approach for the evaluation of transport investment alternatives

Cited by 40 publications

References 3 publications

Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review

Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review

Application of AHP and ELECTRE III/IV Methods to Multiple Level, Multiple Criteria Evaluation of Urban Transportation Projects

IMPACTS OF BOSPORUS BRIDGES oN THE ISTANBUL METROPOLITAN SETTLEMENT AREAS

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About