2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.05.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decision support system for the diagnosis of melanoma: A comparative approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
53
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Many previous studies have presented very high prediction rates, such as 100% in Ruiz et al (2011); however, such prediction rates were obtaining by testing the constructed classification models using internal evaluation approaches, that have been shown to give optimistically biased estimates (Ambroise, et al, 2002). These estimates may be indicative of the model's performances on the training data; however, these estimates are far from being representative of the effectiveness of the model to new, unseen data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many previous studies have presented very high prediction rates, such as 100% in Ruiz et al (2011); however, such prediction rates were obtaining by testing the constructed classification models using internal evaluation approaches, that have been shown to give optimistically biased estimates (Ambroise, et al, 2002). These estimates may be indicative of the model's performances on the training data; however, these estimates are far from being representative of the effectiveness of the model to new, unseen data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The first category consists of efforts focusing on statistical pattern recognition, whereas the second category comprises efforts focusing on template matching and content-based image retrieval. Regarding the first category, representative studies may be found in (Cavalcanti, et al, 2013), which proposed a k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) classifier using 52 features extracted based on the ABCD rule with 99.3% overall accuracy, in Jaleel et al (2012), which proposed an artificial neural network (ANN) classifier with 100% prediction accuracy and in Ruiz et al (2011), which proposed an ensemble pattern recognition scheme combining three distinct classifiers, the k-NN, the Bayesian and the ANN, with accuracy 87.76%. Regarding the second category, representative studies can be found in Ballerini et al (2010;2013), which proposed a content-based image retrieval system investigating textural and color features, in Maragoudakis and Maglogiannis (2011), which proposed an ontology structure model based on features extracted from skin lesion images based on agglomerative clustering and distance criteria and in Chen et al (2016), which is a recent study proposing a content-based image retrieval system that identified melanomas on plain photography images with performances exceeding 90% for all metrics tested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods work independently and also in combination making a collaborative decision support system. The classification rates obtained are around 87% [18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Other approach for decision support tool was proposed by Daniel Ruiz et al in 2011 [20]. This independently working method includes artificial neural network (ANN) classifiers, a Bayesian classifier, and the algorithm of the K-nearest neighbours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%