2019
DOI: 10.3390/f10050440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decision Support Tool for Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Multiple Ecosystem Services

Abstract: In the climate change era, forest managers are challenged to use innovative tools to encourage a sustained provision of goods and services. Many decision support tools (DSTs), developed to address global changes in forest management practices, reflect the complexity of the scientific knowledge produced, a fact that could make it difficult for practitioners to understand and adopt them. Acknowledging the importance of knowledge transfer to forestry practitioners, this study describes a user-centric decision sup… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the interactivity offers attractive possibilities for engagement, awareness building, and reaching the viewer's emotions (Sheppard 2005), meanwhile providing an impactful platform for learning complex Systems Thinking contexts around sustainability (Smithwick et al 2018). Another successful employment of interactive visualized methods in forest management can be found in the works of Cristal et al (2019), Smith et al (2012), which agree with our findings on the efficacy of these tools. Some of the participants' comments on how the dynamic Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Also, the interactivity offers attractive possibilities for engagement, awareness building, and reaching the viewer's emotions (Sheppard 2005), meanwhile providing an impactful platform for learning complex Systems Thinking contexts around sustainability (Smithwick et al 2018). Another successful employment of interactive visualized methods in forest management can be found in the works of Cristal et al (2019), Smith et al (2012), which agree with our findings on the efficacy of these tools. Some of the participants' comments on how the dynamic Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the simulation model of this study concentrates on the logistics of the wood supply chain and thus connects the initial harvesting and final industry consumption of those studies [22][23][24]. Furthermore, impacts of climate change and risks were simulated on a higher abstraction level with other methods for upstream processes such as primal tree planting, forest stand growths, and forest management, but the studies did not focus on supply chain management and wood logistic [25][26][27][28]. Others simulated wood supply chains and pointed out the resulting outcomes of risks such as raw material availability and quality [19], quality loss during storage [29], and oversupply [13,14], but did not focus on concrete contingency strategies and plans to give operative decision support to manage those risks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process-based models (PBMs) can therefore be helpful to fill this gap. PBMs serve as the framework of physiological principles and mechanisms (Johnsen et al 2001;Fontes et al 2010;Seely et al 2015;Cristal et al 2019), and can extrapolate growth across the landscape, by remote sensing and geographic information systems (RS & GIS) (Tickle et al 2001). Coupling PBMs and global climate models (GCMs) is a pre-eminent approach to determining climate change impacts on forest growth and C dynamics (Almeida et al 2009;Battaglia et al 2009;Pinkard et al 2010;Seely et al 2015;Elli et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%