2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2010.2053222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decision-Tree-Based Method for Fault Classification in Single-Circuit Transmission Lines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, these techniques apply direct analysis over symmetrical components [20] or use spectral analysis (such as FFT [18] or DWT [21]) to extract the fault features. These studies are commonly supported by computational intelligence, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) [22], Fuzzy Logic (FL) [23], Decision Trees (DTs) [24] or Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, these techniques apply direct analysis over symmetrical components [20] or use spectral analysis (such as FFT [18] or DWT [21]) to extract the fault features. These studies are commonly supported by computational intelligence, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) [22], Fuzzy Logic (FL) [23], Decision Trees (DTs) [24] or Support Vector Machines (SVMs) [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Security is a measure of assessing the performance of the proposed differential relaying scheme in case of external fault situations. An interesting observation is made while comparing the performance indices of DT-based relaying [9] with the proposed differential relaying scheme at different fault locations of the studied single circuit transmission line. The feature set considered in [9] includes voltage and current signals of different phases.…”
Section: Performance Assessment and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, which includes deriving differential features, building DT, transforming DT to fuzzy-DT and final relaying decision. The proposed scheme includes 21 possible differential features which could be mostly affected during the fault process [2, [8][9][10][11]. The differential features considered in the proposed study are as follows: † X 1 = ∂(V s1 − V r1 )/dt: (rate of change of positive sequence voltage difference) † X 2 = ∂(I s1 − I r1 )/dt: (rate of change of positive sequence current difference) † X 3 = ∂(V s2 − V r2 )/dt: (rate of change of negative-sequence voltage difference) † X 4 = ∂(I s2 − I r2 )/dt: (rate of change of negative-sequence current difference)…”
Section: Proposed Relaying Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to overcome the above problems due to system inconstancy and for better performance, several authors explored artificial intelligence applications with fuzzy logic [8,9], artificial neural networks (ANNs) [10,11], support vector machines (SVMs) [12,13], etc., to solve the fault classification problem. The inputs to these knowledge-based methods are mainly either steady-state or transient components of the fault voltage/current signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%