2001
DOI: 10.1080/10293523.2001.11082431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A decomposition of style-based risk on the JSE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
19
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Van Rensburg and Robertson (2003), using dividend adjusted monthly JSE data from the BARRA organisation between 1990 and 2000, re-examine more or less the same style strategies as van Rensburg (2001) but use individual share level characteristics. Using the standard cross-sectional regression procedure (Fama and Macbeth, 1973) and a multifactor model, they find only two significant styles: size and price to earnings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Van Rensburg and Robertson (2003), using dividend adjusted monthly JSE data from the BARRA organisation between 1990 and 2000, re-examine more or less the same style strategies as van Rensburg (2001) but use individual share level characteristics. Using the standard cross-sectional regression procedure (Fama and Macbeth, 1973) and a multifactor model, they find only two significant styles: size and price to earnings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Rensburg (2001), using dividend adjusted monthly return data from industrial shares on the JSE between * Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa. Email: mchlwrd@gmail.com; chrism@iafrica.com 1983 and 1999, examines more than 20 style strategies using a portfolio approach, and finds eleven of these to be statistically significant after adjusting for risk.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different benchmarks have been used in other studies, for example a standard market model (Kaul, Mehrotra, & Morck, 2000;Chen, Noronha, & Singal, 2004;Shankar & Miller, 2006) and a capital asset pricing model (CAPM) (Amihud & Mendelson, 1986;Elliot, Van Ness, Walker, & Wan, 2006;Shankar & Miller, 2006). These benchmarks have been shown to be inadequate -the CAPM, in particular, fails to account for expected returns on the basis of company size, as well as growth versus value (Fama & French, 1992;1993;1996;1998) and resource versus non-resource shares -which is relevant especially in the South African context (Van Rensburg 2001;Van Rensburg & Robertson 2003a, 2003b. A 12-parameter-style model to estimate benchmark returns was therefore used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past three decades many academic studies have found evidence supporting the premise that value investing outperforms growth inv esting over the longer term -both internationally (see for example Basu, 1983;Fama & French, 1992;Lakonishok, Shleifer & Vishny, 1994;Fama & French, 1998) and in South Africa (see for example Fraser & Page, 2000;Van Rensburg, 2001;Van Rensburg & Robertson, 2003;Basciewitz & Auret, 2009;Strugnell, Gilbert & Kruger, 2011 ;Hoffman, 2012). However, value investing does not outperform growth investing on a consistent basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%