A Deconcentrated Technology Policy—Lessons from the Sophia-Antipolis Experience

Abstract

In the present period of drastic technological changes, the best way of increasing the innovative capacity of an economy is no longer to accumulate resources in strategic fields nor to increase incentives to private firms and other actors, but to develop networks of creative interrelations between them. This depends more on collective processes than on traditional public decisions. In that perspective, local synergies and properly organised capacities of territorial structures are of great potential. In this paper it is proposed that the conception of technology policy be revised along such lines. Careful analyses of far-reaching experiences like Sophia-Antipolis bring about creative insights and help to build effective technology policies. In the first part of the paper the history of Sophia-Antipolis is analysed in the perspective of technology policy. In the second part we draw lessons regarding two issues: The territorial basis of technology policy, and the new forms of ‘public’ action.

Untangling the Spaces of High Technology in Malaysia

“…A powerful international model o f the science park as a new kind o f city or a garden city campus (Forsyth and Crewe, 2010) has emerged, which continues to foster the impression that high-technology industry and benefits that attend its location-high-skilled and high-paid jobs, new company spin-outs, innovative activities, multiplier effects-can be corralled into defined policy spaces as a viable tool for dispersing economic development away from existing core (often) capital-city regions. This has been the logic in various national experiences o f science and technology policy decentralization (eg, Kawashima and Stohr, 1988;Perrin, 1988), though the ingredients o f success o f designated high-tech spaces can often turn on idiosyncratic ingredients such as the personality and political and policy connections o f key individuals. In this way, science parks have often sought to selectively remove and cultivate particular parts o f the division o f labor (Massey e ta l, 1992)-their contribution to local and regional economic development being based on the generation o f M arshallian externalities o f industry specialization.…”

Los factores regionales de innovación como parte del sistema económico europeo 2000 - 2010

“…• Dentro de un sistema regional las actividades innovadoras requieren un entorno innovador donde es importante el intercambio reciproco de personal, conocimientos científicos y tecnológicos, servicios especializados e impulsos innovadores (Perrin, 1988 Los factores obtenidos representan un papel importante en los sistemas regionales de innovación:…”

High-tech Centres and Regional Innovation: Some Case Studies in the UK, Germany, Japan and Korea

“…The main contributions to technology transfer by HTCs arise from their proximity to the HEIs or centres of resear~h and the encouragement of contacts between these firms and academics by the HTe management. The experience of several HTC developments shows how appropriate territorial structuring helps to extend technological performances far beyond the incubation process (Perrin, 1987). In this way, the experience of academic institutions is brought to bear on industrial operations at close range and effectively.…”