2010
DOI: 10.1093/njaf/27.3.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Decrease in Oak Litter Mass Changes Nutrient Dynamics in the Litter Layer of a Central Hardwood Forest

Abstract: The abundance of oak is declining in the central hardwood forest, resulting in structural and functional changes in the litter layer. We hypothesized that a decline in oak litter mass associated with a lower oak component will result in an increase in nutrient cycling rates in the litterlayer. To test this hypothesis, we compared mass loss and C, N, P, and Ca dynamics in pure oak litter and in litter made of 48% oak plus 52% five other deciduous species in a central hardwood forest in West Virginia. In 12 mont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the spring, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization decreased with increasing ice storm severity and frequency, but in the fall, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization increased with increasing ice storm severity and frequency. This suggests that, while reduced availability of belowground plant carbon for arbuscular mycorrhizae in the spring may have exacerbated ice storm impacts on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization, later in the growing season, these same plants may have increased photosynthate allocation belowground and to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal symbionts with increased ice storm severity and frequency, perhaps due to nutrient limitation resulting from the addition of ice storm‐produced woody debris (Homyak et al, 2008; Johnson & Gehring, 2007; Lajtha, 2020; Piatek, 2011). The positive response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization to ice storm severity and frequency in the fall could also be a response to enhanced root growth (Giovannetti et al, 1993; Rhoads et al, 2002), but, to date, there have been no significant differences in root growth among the ice storm treatments (T. J. Fahey, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the spring, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization decreased with increasing ice storm severity and frequency, but in the fall, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization increased with increasing ice storm severity and frequency. This suggests that, while reduced availability of belowground plant carbon for arbuscular mycorrhizae in the spring may have exacerbated ice storm impacts on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization, later in the growing season, these same plants may have increased photosynthate allocation belowground and to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal symbionts with increased ice storm severity and frequency, perhaps due to nutrient limitation resulting from the addition of ice storm‐produced woody debris (Homyak et al, 2008; Johnson & Gehring, 2007; Lajtha, 2020; Piatek, 2011). The positive response of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal colonization to ice storm severity and frequency in the fall could also be a response to enhanced root growth (Giovannetti et al, 1993; Rhoads et al, 2002), but, to date, there have been no significant differences in root growth among the ice storm treatments (T. J. Fahey, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, lower photosynthesis following ice storms reduces carbon availability and thus may reduce mycorrhizal fungi colonization and development (Bücking & Heyser, 2003; Johnson & Gehring, 2007; van der Heyde et al, 2017). Alternatively, the pulse of carbon inputs to soil resulting from canopy damage may immobilize soil nutrients (e.g., within 1 year of wood addition in Homyak et al, 2008; Lajtha, 2020; Piatek, 2011), causing trees to allocate more carbon belowground to access scare nutrients, thereby increasing support for mycorrhizal fungal associations (Allen et al, 2003; Kivlin et al, 2013; Treseder, 2004). Finally, warmer soils under canopy gaps may increase mycorrhizal fungal colonization (Kivlin et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Cornus (dogwood) and Quercus (oak) mass loss can range from 50–75% to 25–55%, respectively, between field studies after one year of decomposition (Blair, 1988; Blair et al, 1992; Carreiro et al, 2000; Knoepp et al, 2005; Piatek et al, 2010). Pinus (pine) litter displayed highly variable decay rates over time after 5 years of field decomposition over 28 sites throughout North America (Gholz et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many species in the microbial communities of anaerobic environments, such as soil and aquatic bottom sediments, can degrade the biomass produced by photosynthetic organisms. These species are currently used in material recycling, such as in the degradation of animal or plant remains , and as nitrogen-fixing agents for agricultural use . Thus, anaerobic digestion remains essential to the biogeochemical cycling of organic and inorganic matter.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%