2023
DOI: 10.1002/ima.22892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep conventional neural network model for glioma tumor segmentation

Abstract: Glioma represents one of the most aggressive cancers, which can develop in the brain. The automatic tumor segmentation and its sub‐regions represent a challenging task owing to their considerable structural variation. It can appear in different ways and with several shapes, which makes tissue identification a crucial task. Reliable and accurate segmentation presents an important component in tumor treatment and diagnosis planning. To overcome these drawbacks, various Deep Learning (DL) schemes are proposed to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional RBAF 35 method accomplishes higher DSC score of 83% for WT, maximum Sy value of 93% for WT, enhanced Sp score of 99% for all the segments, and minimum Hausdorff 95 of 13.6 for ET. The existing Deep CNN 54 attains improved DSC score of 88% for ET, increased Sy score of 90% for WT, higher Sp value of 99% for all the tumors, and minimum Hausdorff 95 performance of 5.34 for TC. The achieved DSC value for ET is 96%, WT is 94%, TC is 98%, Sy score for ET is 98%, WT is 99%, TC is 98%, Sp score for ET is 100%, WT is 100%, TC is 100%, and Hausdorff 95 for ET is 5.3, WT is 4.2, TC is 4.05 which clearly illustrates that the introduced system attains better performance than the other conventional approaches.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The conventional RBAF 35 method accomplishes higher DSC score of 83% for WT, maximum Sy value of 93% for WT, enhanced Sp score of 99% for all the segments, and minimum Hausdorff 95 of 13.6 for ET. The existing Deep CNN 54 attains improved DSC score of 88% for ET, increased Sy score of 90% for WT, higher Sp value of 99% for all the tumors, and minimum Hausdorff 95 performance of 5.34 for TC. The achieved DSC value for ET is 96%, WT is 94%, TC is 98%, Sy score for ET is 98%, WT is 99%, TC is 98%, Sp score for ET is 100%, WT is 100%, TC is 100%, and Hausdorff 95 for ET is 5.3, WT is 4.2, TC is 4.05 which clearly illustrates that the introduced system attains better performance than the other conventional approaches.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This section discusses, the analysis of outcomes accomplished from various simulation experiment for BT segmentation and OSP. The existing methods such as ResUNet+, 53 radiomics based automatic framework (RBAF), 35 DCNN, 54 encoder–decoder method with depthwise atrous spatial pyramid pooling Network (EDD‐Net), 55 Weight loss function and Dropout U‐Net with convNeXt block (WD‐UNeXt), 56 focal cross transformer, 57 Attention‐based Multimodal Glioma Segmentation (AMMGS), 58 Segmentation based on Transformer and U2‐Net (STrans‐U2Net), 59 deep Residual U‐Net (dRes U‐Net), 60 and DenseTransformer (DenseTrans) 61 are compared with the introduced approach based on DSC, Sy, Sp and Hausdorff 95 in Table 6.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation