2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Exon Cryptic Splice Site Promotes Aberrant Intron Retention in a Von Willebrand Disease Patient

Abstract: A translationally silent single nucleotide mutation in exon 44 (E44) of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene is associated with inefficient removal of intron 44 in a von Willebrand disease (VWD) patient. This intron retention (IR) event was previously attributed to reordered E44 secondary structure that sequesters the normal splice donor site. We propose an alternative mechanism: the mutation introduces a cryptic splice donor site that interferes with the function of the annotated site to favor IR. We evaluate… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of these splicing mutations occur within or close to conserved consensus donor (+1/+2) or acceptor (−1/−2) splice sites ( 17 ). However, mutations remote from the splice donor or acceptor sites have also been shown to lead to aberrant splicing in a number of reports ( 18 20 ). Thus, intronic mutations particularly within the splice sites (∼20 bp) must be considered more readily when evaluating sequence variants, especially when tributary mutation in coding regions or canonical splice sites cannot be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these splicing mutations occur within or close to conserved consensus donor (+1/+2) or acceptor (−1/−2) splice sites ( 17 ). However, mutations remote from the splice donor or acceptor sites have also been shown to lead to aberrant splicing in a number of reports ( 18 20 ). Thus, intronic mutations particularly within the splice sites (∼20 bp) must be considered more readily when evaluating sequence variants, especially when tributary mutation in coding regions or canonical splice sites cannot be found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this number might be undervalued due to the lack of transcript assays. The previously reported VWD-associated splicing mutations occur within or close to the conserved consensus 5′ donor or 3′ ss (e.g., c.323 + 1 G > T, or c.2547−13 T > A), as well as exonic modulatory splicing elements, which cause either exon skipping or intron retention [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ]. All these VWD-causing splicing mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing or targeted NGS, which cover exons and exon–intron junctions (usually up to 50 bp of introns).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%