2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-12053-4_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Generative Model of Neonatal Cortical Surface Development

Abstract: The neonatal cortical surface is known to be affected by preterm birth, and the subsequent changes to cortical organisation have been associated with poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes. Deep Generative models have the potential to lead to clinically interpretable models of disease, but developing these on the cortical surface is challenging since established techniques for learning convolutional filters are inappropriate on non-flat topologies. To close this gap, we implement a surfacebased CycleGAN using mixt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to running all experiments we ran ablation analyses, on the task of simulating healthy cortical neurodevelopment. Experimental design was validated against a baseline CycleGAN, trained to translate examples between two discrete classes: term (PMA ≥ 37 weeks) and preterm (PMA < 37 weeks) [40]. Model parameters were then evaluated by investigating the impact of changing training cycle length (from n = [2, 3, 4, 5]), and evaluating how well the model performed when trained to learn images directly instead of age difference maps - to test the hypothesis that learning difference maps improves subject specificity (run for the n=3 cycle only).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prior to running all experiments we ran ablation analyses, on the task of simulating healthy cortical neurodevelopment. Experimental design was validated against a baseline CycleGAN, trained to translate examples between two discrete classes: term (PMA ≥ 37 weeks) and preterm (PMA < 37 weeks) [40]. Model parameters were then evaluated by investigating the impact of changing training cycle length (from n = [2, 3, 4, 5]), and evaluating how well the model performed when trained to learn images directly instead of age difference maps - to test the hypothesis that learning difference maps improves subject specificity (run for the n=3 cycle only).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we propose an extension to our preliminary work [40], which trained a CycleGAN to translate cortical appearance of preterm scans to appear like healthy term controls. As the model was conditioned purely on discrete classes, it was was not able to continuously age brains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%