2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2022.108088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning approach to fast radiative transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An NN emulator that can be used in the RTM was developed some time ago (Chevallier et al., 1998) and was applied to the data assimilation system of the numerical weather prediction (NWP) model (Chevallier et al., 2000). The emulation studies in the RTM are still actively performing (Bue et al., 2019; Liang & Liu, 2020; Stegmann et al., 2022), eventually targeting to the aircraft‐satellite data assimilation in relation to the improvement of forward operator. Recent RTM emulator studies based on clear‐sky simulations have shown a of 1.87–10.88‐fold speedup (Liu et al., 2020) when used with the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCMs (RRTMG; Iacono et al., 2008), and 1.8–3.5‐fold (Ukkonen et al., 2020) and up to 4‐fold (Veerman et al., 2021) for the RRTMG—Parallel scheme (Pincus et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An NN emulator that can be used in the RTM was developed some time ago (Chevallier et al., 1998) and was applied to the data assimilation system of the numerical weather prediction (NWP) model (Chevallier et al., 2000). The emulation studies in the RTM are still actively performing (Bue et al., 2019; Liang & Liu, 2020; Stegmann et al., 2022), eventually targeting to the aircraft‐satellite data assimilation in relation to the improvement of forward operator. Recent RTM emulator studies based on clear‐sky simulations have shown a of 1.87–10.88‐fold speedup (Liu et al., 2020) when used with the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCMs (RRTMG; Iacono et al., 2008), and 1.8–3.5‐fold (Ukkonen et al., 2020) and up to 4‐fold (Veerman et al., 2021) for the RRTMG—Parallel scheme (Pincus et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are often referred to as hybrid approaches and merge calculations based in physics and statistical methods. For example, low-fidelity physical radiative transfer calculations can be augmented by a neural network to match those of high-fidelity calculations (Brodrick et al, 2021), radiative transfer calculations performed at a subset of wavelengths can be extended across the entire spectral range (Le et al, 2020), or a neural network is used to predict the atmospheric transmittance profile that can then be used in a physical RTM (Stegmann et al, 2022). Using a hybrid approach reduces the dimensionality of the challenge compared to end-toend approaches at the cost of an increased computational burden.…”
Section: Radiative Transfer Speed-up Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these contexts the radiative transfer integral is approximated using parameterizations. One such optimization parameterizes radiative transfer via linear regression (or, more recently, neural networks, Stegmann et al., 2022) against atmospheric and surface conditions, such as the The Joint Center for Satellite Data Assimilation's Community Radiative Transfer Model (Johnson et al., 2023). In the spectral dimension, radiances can be predicted by sparsely sampling frequencies and integrating via a weighted mean, thereby reducing the number of monochromatic radiative transfer calculations required (Buehler et al., 2010; Moncet et al., 2008).…”
Section: Approximations For Spectral Integrals In Radiative Transfer ...mentioning
confidence: 99%