2022
DOI: 10.18280/ts.390319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning-Based Cluster Analysis Method for Large-Scale Multi-Label Images

Abstract: Large-scale multi-label image classification requires determining the presence or absence of a target object in a large number of sample images. For highly specialized and complex multi-label image sets, it is especially important to ensure the accuracy of image classification. Traditional deep learning models usually don’t take into account image-label correlation constraints when classifying multi-label images, and the strategy of classifying images based only on their own features greatly limits the model p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, if the results are observed carefully, RNN attempts to overfit the entire dataset and fails miserably by achieving test accuracy of only 50 percent, whereas CNN achieves test and train accuracies that are equivalent. For the dataset, it can be inferred that CNN has an accuracy of 400 misclassified images out of 40,000, of which 350 are from the training side and 50 are from the testing side [39][40][41][42]. Table 1 depicts the performance of the proposed work in training, testing, and prediction.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, if the results are observed carefully, RNN attempts to overfit the entire dataset and fails miserably by achieving test accuracy of only 50 percent, whereas CNN achieves test and train accuracies that are equivalent. For the dataset, it can be inferred that CNN has an accuracy of 400 misclassified images out of 40,000, of which 350 are from the training side and 50 are from the testing side [39][40][41][42]. Table 1 depicts the performance of the proposed work in training, testing, and prediction.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%