2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deep learning framework for modelling left-turning vehicle behaviour considering diagonal-crossing motorcycle conflicts at mixed-flow intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the data for training and evaluation were both from simulations. In [28], a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based network was employed to encode vehicle historical motion features, the graph attention network (GAT) and a synthesized network were integrated to model vehicle-vehicle interaction and vehicle-motorcycle interaction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the data for training and evaluation were both from simulations. In [28], a long short-term memory (LSTM)-based network was employed to encode vehicle historical motion features, the graph attention network (GAT) and a synthesized network were integrated to model vehicle-vehicle interaction and vehicle-motorcycle interaction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them studied the behavior of motorcycle riders approaching or passing through signalized intersections. A few studies investigated the maneuvering behavior in queues [1,2] and the crossing behavior [29,30] of motorcycle riders at signalized urban intersections. These studies explored various behaviors of motorcycle riders riding along urban road networks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in contrast to trajectory prediction models, which are commonly compared to each other on accepted benchmarks (such as on the ETH dataset [10], [11], [12] when predicting pedestrian crowds), an equivalent benchmark does not exist for binary prediction models [46]. Instead, those models are mostly trained and tested on datasets exclusive to the respective work and are-if at all-only compared against a small number of other selected models [32], [33], [38], [39], [40], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%