2021
DOI: 10.3390/a14030075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Learning Model for Data-Driven Discovery of Functional Connectivity

Abstract: Functional connectivity (FC) studies have demonstrated the overarching value of studying the brain and its disorders through the undirected weighted graph of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) correlation matrix. However, most of the work with the FC depends on the way the connectivity is computed, and it further depends on the manual post-hoc analysis of the FC matrices. In this work, we propose a deep learning architecture BrainGNN that learns the connectivity structure as part of learning to class… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show three different results, one for each of the paper contributions. We compare our results with SOTA DL methods [6], [15], [22], [23], [26], [32], [47], [52]- [55] depending on the task, and ML methods such as support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR). To be fair to the other papers, we report directly from the results mentioned in the papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We show three different results, one for each of the paper contributions. We compare our results with SOTA DL methods [6], [15], [22], [23], [26], [32], [47], [52]- [55] depending on the task, and ML methods such as support vector machine (SVM) and logistic regression (LR). To be fair to the other papers, we report directly from the results mentioned in the papers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The representations can then be used for node classification, graph classification, or predicting edges between nodes by using an existing true graph structure or learning the graph [5], [7]- [14]. For any of the mentioned tasks, most of the existing work (classification, link prediction) has been done on static graphs, e.g., [6], creates a static graph based on representation and phenotype infor-mation of subjects, [15] learns a static graph between brain regions, [13] learns a static graph in an interacting system. In reality, many fields (social networks, brain connectivity, traffic data, speech) are dynamically changing and cannot be completely represented using a static graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(c) BRAINNETTF vs. neural network models on learnable brain networks. Unlike classical GNNs, FBNETGEN [35], DGM [38] and BrainNetGNN [45] hold a similar idea, which is to apply GNNs based on a learnable graph. FBNETGEN achieves SOTA performance on the ABCD dataset for biological sex prediction, and the learnable graphs can be seen as a type of attention score.…”
Section: Performance Analysis (Rq1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the statistical correlations are not specific to the downstream prediction tasks. Recently, there are some works that attempt to generate the brain networks and predict for the downstream tasks jointly [17], [23], [27]. But they are mainly based on structure similarity from GNNs [17] or attention weights [23], [27], which still cannot well characterize the complex relationships among different regions.…”
Section: A Fmri-based Brain Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%