2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3002826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deep Multi-Label Learning Framework for the Intelligent Fault Diagnosis of Machines

Abstract: Deep learning has been applied in intelligent fault diagnosis of machines since it trains deep neural networks to simultaneously learn features and recognize faults. In the intelligent fault diagnosis methods based on deep learning, feature learning and fault recognition are achieved by solving a multi-class classification problem. The multi-class classification, however, has not considered the relationships of fault labels, leading to two weaknesses of these methods. One is that it cannot ensure to learn the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the upper bound of the loss function H(•, •) is denoted as U . Definition 7 : Assuming that the loss function of the GLLP algorithm is H(u, φ) = (u(c) − d) 2 , then for any ι > 0, when the probability is greater than or equal to 1 − ι, the generalization error limit of GLLP is:…”
Section: ) Generalization Ability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the upper bound of the loss function H(•, •) is denoted as U . Definition 7 : Assuming that the loss function of the GLLP algorithm is H(u, φ) = (u(c) − d) 2 , then for any ι > 0, when the probability is greater than or equal to 1 − ι, the generalization error limit of GLLP is:…”
Section: ) Generalization Ability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When faults occur in the system, it is vital to quickly and accurately find the points of faults and the causes of the faults. In actual mechanical systems, the collected fault data often lacks a large amount of label information, which is a fatal blow to most existing fault diagnosis methods based on supervised learning and deep learning [1], [2]. How to accurately classify the fault type using the only incomplete label at hand?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method requires a large amount of computational resources. In an effort to utilize correlated features in terms of multiple classification tasks, Shen et al [23] proposed a multiple-label framework applied to raw vibration signals to predict single faults with the level of degradation. The simplicity of signal representation made it difficult to ensure stability under conditions of variable rotational speeds and noisy working environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al (2018) used a pretraining process to reduce the overfitting of image classification [21] to improve the performance of their proposed CNN. Training CNN to learn features and recognize faults in data was applied to solve a multiclass problem [22]. The result showed that the connection between features, which were trained by CNN, and the accuracy of classification are higher than conventional training approach [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Training CNN to learn features and recognize faults in data was applied to solve a multiclass problem [22]. The result showed that the connection between features, which were trained by CNN, and the accuracy of classification are higher than conventional training approach [22]. However, none of this information is dedicated to interpret impact echo data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%