2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta11859a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A defect-driven atomically dispersed Fe–N–C electrocatalyst for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalytic activity in Zn–air batteries

Abstract: The optimized Fe–N–NDC-1-900 exhibits robust anchoring ability to immobilize atomic Fe species with abundant Fe–N4 sites, demonstrating excellent electrocatalytic activity in both the ORR and OER.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, large-scale applications of ZABs are still restricted due to the sluggish multielectron transfer process of OER and ORR. As of now, noble metal catalysts such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 for OER and Pt/C for ORR are regarded as benchmark catalysts . Although these catalysts exhibit excellent electrocatalytic activities, their high cost, limited stability, scarcity, and the inability of a single catalyst to perform both reactions hinder their widespread applications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, large-scale applications of ZABs are still restricted due to the sluggish multielectron transfer process of OER and ORR. As of now, noble metal catalysts such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 for OER and Pt/C for ORR are regarded as benchmark catalysts . Although these catalysts exhibit excellent electrocatalytic activities, their high cost, limited stability, scarcity, and the inability of a single catalyst to perform both reactions hinder their widespread applications .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of now, noble metal catalysts such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 for OER and Pt/ C for ORR are regarded as benchmark catalysts. 4 Although T h i s c o n t e n t i s these catalysts exhibit excellent electrocatalytic activities, their high cost, limited stability, scarcity, and the inability of a single catalyst to perform both reactions hinder their widespread applications. 5 Therefore, current research is primarily aimed toward replacing these precious noble metal catalysts with cost-effective and high-performance catalysts for ZABs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7b, the electrons transfer from Fe/N-G-800/FePc and Fe@Fe/N-G-800 to adsorbed O 2 are 0.26 e and 0.31 e , respectively. 55,56 The electron localization functions shown in Fig. S19† also illustrate this point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Thus, the 399 eV peak in CTNC-Fe in Figure 4a is likely related to either N−Fe moieties, the Fe being coordinated by pyridinic N, or there is a mixture of N−Fe and pyridinic N. The same can be said for the pyrrolic/graphitic N peak as it manifests at 400.8 eV in P-CTNC (Figure S3d). The presence of Fe in CTNC-Fe increased the deconvoluted peak energy values of pyridinic N and pyrrolic/graphitic N ∼0.4 eV, which means it is likely that N−Fe moieties are composed of not only pyridinic N but also graphitic and pyrrolic N. 65 Furthermore, the atom percent of pyrrolic and graphitic N is almost double that of pyridinic N as seen in Table S1. Therefore, even if it was less energetically favorable for Fe to interact with graphitic and pyrrolic N to form FeN x -active sites than it is with pyridinic N, the greater concentration of these N species would make up for it.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%