2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8487997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deformation Prediction Model of High Arch Dams in the Initial Operation Period Based on PSR-SVM-IGWO

Abstract: The deformation prediction of the dam in the initial stage of operation is very important for the safety of high dams. A hybrid model integrating chaos theory, support vector machine (SVM), and an improved Grey Wolf Optimization (IGWO) algorithm is developed for deformation prediction of dam in the initial operation period. Firstly, the chaotic characteristics of the dam deformation time series will be identified, mainly using the Lyapunov exponent method, the correlation dimension method, and the Kolmogorov e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to dam safety has proliferated in recent times. Numerous scientific references related to the use of ML, DL, or hybrid models with other types of models such as statistical, time series, or physics-based numerical models can be found [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Machine Learning models have shown good performance in monitoring data prediction and are more accessible to interpretation than DL models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of artificial intelligence (AI) models applied to dam safety has proliferated in recent times. Numerous scientific references related to the use of ML, DL, or hybrid models with other types of models such as statistical, time series, or physics-based numerical models can be found [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Machine Learning models have shown good performance in monitoring data prediction and are more accessible to interpretation than DL models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of these ML models has increased in comparison to multiple linear regression 25,26 -based, partial least squares regression 27,28 -based, and stepwise regression 29,30 -based HST and HTT models, especially for concrete dam displacement prediction with small sample and short-term prediction periods. 18,[31][32][33][34] Nevertheless, these ML models still have issues, one of which is that the essence of these models still relies on the statistical models that use hydrostatic pressure, temperature, and aging components as inputs for training, and the reasonable selection of explanatory variables is crucial to the accuracy; another reason is that the majority of these algorithms only support multiinput single-output patterns, 22 which reflect the local displacement characteristics of a unitary measurement point rather than the overall response to the dam displacement. Once the scale of the dam displacement measurement points is enormous, it is time-consuming and inefficient to model each point individually.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method does not take into account the possible differences in geological conditions in other regions, and its universality is not high. Li et al [4] established a hybrid model that combines chaos theory, support vector machine, and an improved Gray Wolf optimization algorithm for deformation prediction in the early stages of dam operation. However, the data quality in this method is poor, which affects the accuracy of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%