2022
DOI: 10.1109/tsmc.2021.3091974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Delay Compensation Framework for Connected Testbeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zheng et al [ 42 ] measure the delay between Michigan and California. Guo et al [ 85 ] collect variable delay from real network data using the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Saparia et al [ 86 ] collect data from 4G LTE networks.…”
Section: Impact Of Network Latency On Teleoperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zheng et al [ 42 ] measure the delay between Michigan and California. Guo et al [ 85 ] collect variable delay from real network data using the User Datagram Protocol (UDP). Saparia et al [ 86 ] collect data from 4G LTE networks.…”
Section: Impact Of Network Latency On Teleoperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtual integration and coupling of geographically scattered real-time simulators across communication networks are done in a closed loop [76]. A networked closed-loop system is a system that integrates scattered components into a closed loop via a communication channel.…”
Section: ) Closed Loop Nature Of Co-simulation Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method improves prediction accuracy when models are high-fidelity. The drawbacks include: When models are inaccurate or unavailable, their applications may be hindered [76], and When dynamic models are unavailable, they may not be robust and applicable [116] Examples of modelbased implementation include the Predictive control scheme implemented in [117] [118], the active resilient control scheme implemented in [119], the Model-based event-triggered predictive control (MB-ETPC) scheme implemented in [120], the Adaptive unscented Kalman filter framework implemented in [121], Variable-horizon model predictive control scheme implemented in [121] 3) Model-Free Delay Compensation Framework…”
Section: ) Delay Compensation Framework For Time-varying Signalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, there is a possibility that the robustness of many reported evaluation methods may not be preserved if outliers of communication delay are not considered in common scenarios, such as teleoperation via shared impedance control [ 29 ], delayed bilateral control [ 30 ], evaluation of display methods [ 18 ], and so on. In addition, several studies have proved that compensation strategies are effective in reducing the effect of large communication delays on vehicle mobility [ 6 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Again, what seems to be lacking is the considerations regarding communication outlier detection and the implementation of countermeasures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%