2016
DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2016.2581819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Delta-Readout Scheme for Low-Power CMOS Image Sensors With Multi-Column-Parallel SAR ADCs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the FPN of the prototype APD, the off-chip digital offset adjustment was performed as in Refs. [20,21] so that the variation of APD can be reduced from 3.9 % to less than 0.1 % as shown in Figure 16. However, as the InGaAs APD was implemented as 16 partitioned cells in the prototype chip, the variation of APD is larger than the conventional one inducing the fixed pattern noise (FPN) [19], as shown in Figure 15a,b).…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to reduce the FPN of the prototype APD, the off-chip digital offset adjustment was performed as in Refs. [20,21] so that the variation of APD can be reduced from 3.9 % to less than 0.1 % as shown in Figure 16. However, as the InGaAs APD was implemented as 16 partitioned cells in the prototype chip, the variation of APD is larger than the conventional one inducing the fixed pattern noise (FPN) [19], as shown in Figure 15a,b).…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to reduce the FPN of the prototype APD, the off-chip digital offset adjustment was performed as in Refs. [20,21] so that the variation of APD can be reduced from 3.9 % to less than 0.1 % as shown in Figure 16.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This made it difficult to clarify the distinct range information. In order to reduce the pixel FPN of the prototype APD, off-chip digital offset adjustment was performed as off-chip calibration as in [17,23], so that the offset difference between neighboring pixels could be reduced to under 1 LSB. After offset adjustment, the pixel FPN was reduced to less than 0.1%.…”
Section: Measurement Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could result in the loss of echo information (second echo and third echo) within T DR even though the first echo had already been detected at the Ø SP[n] . In the case of the serial data readout structure as in [15,16,17], the wasted time (T DR ) increases if the pixel resolution is increased and makes it difficult to successively detect incoming echoes, resulting in the deterioration of the detection latency of the FPA-based LADAR system. Here, the detection latency means the total time to become ready to receive the next incoming echo after the previous echo detection.…”
Section: Proposed Readout Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bit of the edge detector is determined according to the edge threshold. The difference between adjacent pixels that exceed the 15 least significant bits (LSB) out of 256 full-scale codes is less than 10% of the entire image, and this value decreases as the image resolution increases [ 27 ]. Therefore, if the difference is more than 8 LSB in the image, the change could be considered sufficiently sudden, and the region could be processed as an edge in the image.…”
Section: Design Of the Proposed Edge-detection Cmos Image Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%