2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3176982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Density-Based Adaptive Ground and Canopy Detecting Method for ICESat-2 Photon-Counting Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For another, ICESat-2 has consistent pulse frequencies and sampling rates over surfaces with different slopes. For the same distance along the track, there are fewer returning photons in steep terrain than in flat areas with the slopes increasing [ 47 , 52 ]. It is necessary to expand the search domain to contain more photons for canopy detection.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For another, ICESat-2 has consistent pulse frequencies and sampling rates over surfaces with different slopes. For the same distance along the track, there are fewer returning photons in steep terrain than in flat areas with the slopes increasing [ 47 , 52 ]. It is necessary to expand the search domain to contain more photons for canopy detection.…”
Section: Experiments Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the density on one side is three times greater than the other, it is considered an excessive difference in neighboring densities. In such cases, the optimal filtering direction is considered false [ 47 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the ability of the algorithm to remove noise photons using single-category indicators and an overall indicator. For the single-category indicators, precision (P), recall (R), and F-measure (F) were used [23]. These indicators were calculated as follows:…”
Section: E Performance Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Framing potential ground photons. As the land topography was more complex and variable than that of water surfaces, each land segment was reduced to sub-segments with a length τ c of 10 m. In mountain areas, the elevations of ground photons were typically located at 0-15% of the elevation range of all land signal photons [40]. In this study, the land photon whose elevation was within 0-15% of the signal elevation range in each sub-segment was considered to be a potential ground photon.…”
Section: Signal Photon Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After determining the ground photons, the remaining signal photons were classified as ground covering photons in land segments. To further remove possible noise, the classified ground, ground covering, and water surface signal photons were filtered using the DBSCAN algorithm [37,40]. Figure 8 illustrates the final signal photons with their corresponding classification labels.…”
Section: Signal Photon Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%