2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A density functional theory study of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Pd/TiO2 catalyst: The role of interfacial site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H 2 O* will be desorbed from the catalyst surface with an energy cost of 0.68 eV. The mild H 2 O formation and easy desorption presentations demonstrate that the OH and H 2 O poisons will be avoided over the Pt 8 /In 2 O 3 catalyst . The remaining CO* will react with H adatoms to create the HCO* radical by climbing TS9.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The H 2 O* will be desorbed from the catalyst surface with an energy cost of 0.68 eV. The mild H 2 O formation and easy desorption presentations demonstrate that the OH and H 2 O poisons will be avoided over the Pt 8 /In 2 O 3 catalyst . The remaining CO* will react with H adatoms to create the HCO* radical by climbing TS9.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, the follow-up reaction steps of H 2 COO* will not be considered anymore. The rough step is also prohibited over the Pt 46 and Pd 3 /TiO 2 catalysts . On the other hand, HCOOH* is generated when the H* approaches the O b atom of HCOO*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum energy path of RWGS pathway from CO 2 to CH 3 OH on FMPA/Mo-MgH 2 (001) surface was shown in Figure 5. The rate-determining step was the HCO * formation, which is consistent with the calculation result in reference [30], whereas the energy barrier was much lower, 1.22 eV here versus 1.50 eV on Pd/TiO 2 . The adsorption energies, rate-determining steps, energy barriers, and reaction energies of C 1 products from CO 2 hydrogenation on FMPA/Mo-MgH 2 (001) surface were summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Rwgs Pathway On Fmpa/mo-mgh 2 (001) Surfacesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, DFT calculations over Pd/TiO 2 catalyst also demonstrated that the CAMERE pathway is the primary route for MeOH production, and CO*‐to‐HCO* conversion is the rate‐determining step. [ 25 ] The other pathway proposes that the first step of MeOH synthesis is the direct CO 2 hydrogenation through formate (HCOO*) or carboxylate (COOH*) intermediate, and the subsequent formate/carboxylate hydrogenation is regarded as the rate‐determining step (formate pathway). [ 26 ] In situ DRIFT measurement confirmed that CO 2 was first activated and converted into HCOO* intermediate at a relatively low temperature in the presence of Co 4 N nanosheets and then generated CH 2 O* species with a further increase of reaction temperature.…”
Section: Thermocatalysismentioning
confidence: 99%