The adsorption of CH3O and H on the (100) facet of gold was studied using self-consistent periodic density functional theory (DFT-GGA) calculations. The best binding site, energy, and structural parameter, as well as the local density… Show more
“…As regards the Au(100) surface, only H adsorption on the bridge and top sites was considered, since the hydrogen atom in hollow position, tended to move to the adjacent bridge site during geometry optimization. This behavior had been previously observed by N'Dollo et al [40]. Thus, the lowest recorded energy was the one for the bridge site, with a value of −3.27 eV , resulting in the most stable site for adsorption.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The adsorption energies and diffusion pathway were calculated for hydrogen atoms on (100) surfaces of representative metals: Au, Cu, Ag and P t. First, the adsorption energies of the hydrogen atom on the three different adsorption sites (hollow, bridge and top) were calculated and the obtained values were compared with previous reports [3,17,18,35,36,37,38,39,40]. In some of that works, Moussounda et al [35] and Nave et al [17] have studied the adsorption energy for a single H atom and then for a single CH 3 on P t(100) in order to find the dissociation pathway of CH 4 on this surface.…”
An extensive study of adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen atoms on (100) surfaces of fcc Au, Cu, Ag and P t was performed by means of DFT calculations. Bulk properties of those metals were calculated and compared with previous results. The adsorption distances and energies of the hydrogen atom on top, hollow and bridge sites of the (100) surfaces were calculated in order to elucidate preferential adsorption sites of hydrogen on each metal. All these calculations were done in conjunction with a study of charge distribution. Finally, diffusion of the H atom from the most stable adsorption site to the nearest neighbouring site was studied in order to obtain diffusion barrier and diffusion velocity values. The highest diffusion velocity was found to be v = 6.44 × 10 11 s −1 for the case of Ag, whereas the lowest was v = 1.13 × 10 7 s −1 for Au.
“…As regards the Au(100) surface, only H adsorption on the bridge and top sites was considered, since the hydrogen atom in hollow position, tended to move to the adjacent bridge site during geometry optimization. This behavior had been previously observed by N'Dollo et al [40]. Thus, the lowest recorded energy was the one for the bridge site, with a value of −3.27 eV , resulting in the most stable site for adsorption.…”
Section: A N U S C R I P Tsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The adsorption energies and diffusion pathway were calculated for hydrogen atoms on (100) surfaces of representative metals: Au, Cu, Ag and P t. First, the adsorption energies of the hydrogen atom on the three different adsorption sites (hollow, bridge and top) were calculated and the obtained values were compared with previous reports [3,17,18,35,36,37,38,39,40]. In some of that works, Moussounda et al [35] and Nave et al [17] have studied the adsorption energy for a single H atom and then for a single CH 3 on P t(100) in order to find the dissociation pathway of CH 4 on this surface.…”
An extensive study of adsorption and diffusion of hydrogen atoms on (100) surfaces of fcc Au, Cu, Ag and P t was performed by means of DFT calculations. Bulk properties of those metals were calculated and compared with previous results. The adsorption distances and energies of the hydrogen atom on top, hollow and bridge sites of the (100) surfaces were calculated in order to elucidate preferential adsorption sites of hydrogen on each metal. All these calculations were done in conjunction with a study of charge distribution. Finally, diffusion of the H atom from the most stable adsorption site to the nearest neighbouring site was studied in order to obtain diffusion barrier and diffusion velocity values. The highest diffusion velocity was found to be v = 6.44 × 10 11 s −1 for the case of Ag, whereas the lowest was v = 1.13 × 10 7 s −1 for Au.
“…system with adsorbate and ref E is the energy of the structure that we used as a reference to compare the relative stability, and more specifically, it is the total energy of the system without an adsorbate on the surface. gas E is the energy of a molecule in its gas phase, calculated by placing an isolated molecule in a box, and N ads is the number of molecules newly adsorbed into the system, which is Although the adsorption energies calculated using the above equation 6 should be given with respect to stable gas-phase species (in our case, CH 3 OH was used, as well as O 2 as reference for atomic O adsorption and H 2 as reference for atomic H adsorption), we found that the convention was to continue to use the above equation for the adsorption energies of the reaction intermediates, regardless of them being radicals[15,[58][59][60] and we thus followed the convention in order to make comparable results. The atomic structures and charge difference are visualized using the VESTA package[61,62].…”
Using the density-functional theory within the generalized gradient approximation, we have studied the partial oxidation of methanol on a Cu(111) surface covered with a chemisorbed oxygen layer that resembles a Cu 2 O layer. Adsorption energies and geometries were computed for methanol, methoxy, hydroxymethyl and formaldehyde on both clean Cu(111) and Cu 2 O/Cu(111) and electronic structures were computed for the reaction intermediates on Cu 2 O/Cu(111). We also calculated the energy barrier for partial oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde on Cu 2 O/Cu(111). These results show that the Cu 2 O monolayer slightly lowers the stability of each of the surface adsorbates and the oxygen strongly promotes hydrogen dissociation by lowering the energy barrier of methanol decomposition and causing the spontaneous dissociation of methanol into methoxy.
“…Details of the calculations of the structures and energetics of adsorbed CH 3 O and H can be found in our previous publication . Methoxy was investigated at each of the symmetric sites.…”
Section: Decomposition Of Methanolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top site was found to be unstable, the radical methoxy moving to the bridge site during geometry optimization. The bridge (Ox) (or bridge H‐hollow in Ref …”
The adsorption of methanol on flat Au (100) surface with different coverages (θ = 1.0, 0.5 and 0.25 monolayer (ML)) is studied using density functional theory. Among the three sites (top, bridge and hollow) and coverages investigated in the present work, no adsorption is stable for θ = 1.0 ML. The most energetically preferred site of adsorption for CH 3 OH is found to be the hollow site for coverages of 0.25 ML and 0.50 ML. We also find that for all adsorption sites, an increase in CH 3 OH coverage triggers a decrease in the adsorption energy. The geometric parameters, local density of states and work function changes are analysed in detail. The coadsorption of methoxy and hydrogen has also investigated. In addition, the dissociation of methanol on Au(100) has been studied, and an activation energy was found to be 1.72 eV. This result compare with existing data in the literature for Au(111) surface.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.