A deplorable community in Bangladesh: tea garden workers

Abstract

Purpose Throughout history, tea garden workers are treated as slaves of employers and live an inhuman life in modern society. This paper aims to provide an account of the deplorable community (workers) of the tea garden in Bangladesh. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a mixed-method research approach to conduct this study. In the first stage, using a semi-structured questionnaire, Focus group discussions (FGDs) were done by forming two groups from two districts to get a clear picture of the tea garden workers’ living standards in Bangladesh. Based on the findings of the FGD, the researchers prepared a structured questionnaire containing the basic elements of their quality of work life. In this stage, the authors collected the information from 200 tea workers about their quality of work life. Findings The major finding showed that the overall country’s economy is booming because of tea workers’ contributions, but their economic conditions gradually become impoverished. The workers’ are living with colossal poverty and vulnerability. Besides, the workers are supposed to get fundamental rights, including food, clothing, shelter, education and health, but the higher authorities were found indifferent to take the necessary initiative to implement these rights. Research limitations/implications The data was collected only from the tea garden workers. This study excluded any other parties (trade union leaders, panchayats, garden managers and owners). Thus, it is suggested that the researchers should conduct a similar study covering the opinion, including all the parties. Practical implications Both the workers and the higher authorities of the tea garden might benefit from this study’s findings. Workers will be more aware of their basic rights. The authorities can also prepare some effective policies to improve the overall quality of life of the tea workers. Originality/value To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first study on tea garden workers’ inhuman life in Bangladesh in the entire emerald insight publishers.

Mental health of hawkers during COVID-19: a marginal community in Bangladesh

“…From the Mental health of hawkers during COVID-19 respondents, people such as "O" and "P" had 3-6 members, including partners in their family, and they were solely responsible for looking after them. The pandemic situation made their earnings reduced, and they were not able to fulfil their family members' needs (Rahaman et al, 2021a(Rahaman et al, , 2021b(Rahaman et al, , 2021c(Rahaman et al, , 2021d. They had the pressure to feed their family, and they were not able to do that.…”

“…But, as an informal societal community, hawkers struggle to manage their daily necessities (Bhuiyan et al, 2020). After the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic, the government enforced the lockdown, and all business sectors were shut down, including educational and business organizations (Rahaman et al, 2021a(Rahaman et al, , 2021b(Rahaman et al, , 2021c(Rahaman et al, , 2021d; hawker businesses are no exception. The livelihoods of the hawker community have degraded since then.…”

“…Some people were worried about what they would do if the virus attacked them, as they could not afford proper medical facilities (Salamzadeh and Dana, 2021). Others were afraid to lose their loved ones, and many suffered from hunger (Rahaman et al, 2021a(Rahaman et al, , 2021b(Rahaman et al, , 2021c(Rahaman et al, , 2021dPaul et al, 2021). Also, they fail to borrow money because no one wants to help them.…”

Thank you, COVID‐19: Positive social psychology towards the new normal

“…The researchers arranged five focus group discussions (FGDs); each group consists of eight members; group members were selected randomly. During the FGDs' researchers discussed the concepts, summary from the inclusive interview (Rahaman et al, 2021), and their views on the positive effects of COVID-19. The group leaders (FGD) appeared in the face to face interview because they belong to a family and have the same experience along with they have collected rest of the members' opinion (Dana, 2007).…”

Positive consequences of COVID-19 pandemic: Reflections based on university students community in Bangladesh

“…Researchers set up four focus group discussions in the first phase, each with five participants chosen at random by zoom breakout. Researchers reviewed the concepts, the summary from the inclusive interview [32] and their perspectives on COVID-19's positive effects during the focus groups discussion. In that platform (Zoom), the respondents from each group shared their opinions on the positive and negative social consequences of COVID-19.…”