1991
DOI: 10.1016/0091-2182(91)90058-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A descriptive analysis of home births attended by CNMs in two nurse-midwifery services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discussions about the appropriate technology for normal birth ( Chalmers, 1992 ) have raised questions about which standards should be used for benchmarking in maternity care and outcome evaluations in lower risk women. Reviews and reports from Europe, Australia, and New Zealand ( Bastian, Keirse, & Lancaster, 1998;Gulbranson, Hilton, McKay, & Cox, 1997;Woodcock, Read, Moore, Stanley, & Bower, 1990 ), where midwifery practice is an integral component of the health care delivery system, as well as data derived from the few U.S. studies that are available ( Anderson & Greener, 1991;Anderson & Murphy, 1994;Gabay & Wolfe, 1997;Murphy & Fullerton, 1998;Rosenblatt et al, 1997 ) offer compelling evidence that differences in outcomes, when they can be identifi ed in lower risk women, are elements of the process of care. Because of their impact on outcomes, choices made about the process of care must also fi gure in evaluations of clinical practice.…”
Section: Measuring Processes Of Care As Well As Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions about the appropriate technology for normal birth ( Chalmers, 1992 ) have raised questions about which standards should be used for benchmarking in maternity care and outcome evaluations in lower risk women. Reviews and reports from Europe, Australia, and New Zealand ( Bastian, Keirse, & Lancaster, 1998;Gulbranson, Hilton, McKay, & Cox, 1997;Woodcock, Read, Moore, Stanley, & Bower, 1990 ), where midwifery practice is an integral component of the health care delivery system, as well as data derived from the few U.S. studies that are available ( Anderson & Greener, 1991;Anderson & Murphy, 1994;Gabay & Wolfe, 1997;Murphy & Fullerton, 1998;Rosenblatt et al, 1997 ) offer compelling evidence that differences in outcomes, when they can be identifi ed in lower risk women, are elements of the process of care. Because of their impact on outcomes, choices made about the process of care must also fi gure in evaluations of clinical practice.…”
Section: Measuring Processes Of Care As Well As Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women choosing alternative models of care may differ from those seeking ordinary care in demographic background and attitudes to maternity care and childbirth. Those interested in home birth were to a greater extent older, better educated, married or cohabiting (5,11,12), multiparous (5,12), and early and regular prenatal care attendees (11) compared with women who preferred to give birth in a hospital.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women who choose alternative maternity care are more often older (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), married (1,3,6,8,9), better educated (1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, lo), and multiparous (1,2, 3,8,9, 1 l), than women who choose conventional obstetric care. They also want to be more actively involved in the birth process (1,3, lo), with higher scores on internal locus of control scales (2,12,13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%