“…HPV detection methods varied among the included studies. Fifteen studies were based on double positivity with both HPV DNA PCR and p16 IHC ( n = 6624) [ 4 , 16 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 28 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], eight studies were based on HPV DNA alone ( n = 426) [ 12 , 14 , 15 , 24 , 25 , 29 , 36 , 41 ], six on p16 alone ( n = 391) [ 17 , 18 , 21 , 26 , 27 , 31 ], one study was based on both HPV DNA and HPV RNA ( n = 99) [ 37 ] and one study did not report a detection method ( n = 42,024) [ 13 ]. Most studies using p16 IHC defined p16-positivity (p16+) according to ASCO guidelines with ≥70% positive staining [ 42 ] ( n = 2663), but one study defined p16+ as ≥10% positive staining ( n = 30) [ 30 ], four studies defined p16+ as ≥75% positive staining ( n = 2678) [ 4 , 22 , 31 , 32 ] and one study did not account for p16-positivity ( n = 926) [ 35 ].…”