1969
DOI: 10.1515/9783111358048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A descriptive syntax of the Ormulum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presence or absence of ME an in this context cannot be taken as indicative of the meaning of the term. Firstly, on the basis of the structure of the noun phrases where it occurs and its inflexional pattern, Palmatier (1969: 113) argues that ME an in the text still acts as a numeral and not as an article, as is the case with ME þe . Secondly, even if ME an were to act as an indefinite article in the text, its use in early Middle English was far from fully established (Mustanoja 1960: 231 and 259–72).…”
Section: Use Of the Terms In Early Middle Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presence or absence of ME an in this context cannot be taken as indicative of the meaning of the term. Firstly, on the basis of the structure of the noun phrases where it occurs and its inflexional pattern, Palmatier (1969: 113) argues that ME an in the text still acts as a numeral and not as an article, as is the case with ME þe . Secondly, even if ME an were to act as an indefinite article in the text, its use in early Middle English was far from fully established (Mustanoja 1960: 231 and 259–72).…”
Section: Use Of the Terms In Early Middle Englishmentioning
confidence: 99%